S M Pandiyan vs The Sub Inspector Of Police And Others
Judges: S Nagamuthu, Anita Sumanth
05 April, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S. NAGAMUTHU,J.,) The petitioner is the father of one Mr.Bharathi, male, aged about 16 years. According to the petitioner, that Mr.Bharathi, has been found missing from 11.01.2017 onwards. Since he has not been secured by the police, despite a case has been register...
Madras High Court
Bhuvaneswari vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges: R Mahadevan
05 April, 2017·The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to file final report in Crime No.20 of 2017 on the file of the respondent, within the time stipulated by this Court.2. It is the case of the petitioner that she has lodged a complaint with the respondent poli...
Madras High Court
S Radhakrishnan vs The Inspector Of Police ( Crimes )
Judges: M V Muralidaran
05 April, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :05.04.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Crl.O.P.No.6516 of 2011 S.Radhakrishnan Vs The Inspector of Police (Crimes), R-6, Kumaran Nagar Police Station, Chennai - 600 083... Petitioner .. RespondentPrayer:- Criminal Original...
Madras High Court
R Vijayakumar vs The State Rep By The Superintendent Of Police And Others
Judges: R Mahadevan
05 April, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the above endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as w...
Madras High Court
Ramasamy And Others vs The State Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
05 April, 2017·The petitioners have come up with the present quash petition to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.37 of 2010 pending on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate Gudiyatham. According to the petitioners that followed by the registration of the case in Crime No.173 of 2009 dated 26.11.2009 for the of...
Madras High Court
M Gowrishankar Applicant vs The Presiding Officer And Others
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
05 April, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 24.03.2017 Delivered on : 05.04.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Review Application Nos.9 and 10 of 2017 in W.A.Nos.885 of 2015 and 117 of 2016 M.Gowrishankar ... Appl...
Madras High Court
Sudha Ravi Kumar And Others vs The Special Commissioner And Commissioner And Others
Judges: S Nagamuthu And, Anita Sumanth
05 April, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 23.03.2017 PRONOUNCED ON : 05.04.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH Writ Petition Nos.30589 of 2013, 16528 of 2015, 33429 of 2015, 11019 of 2015, 16662 of 2015, 28507 of 2015, 39858 ...
Madras High Court
R.Kanagaraj vs Priyadharshni
Judges:
05 April, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submitted that the parties have settled the matter.2. In view of the subsequent events, the civil revision petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.05.04.2017 Gms/Asi K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.Gms/Asi To P...
Madras High Court
A Manish Kumar Proprietor “Dhuaa Authentic Restaurant And Snooker” Old No 7 vs State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By Its Secretary Home Department And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
05 April, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition ...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs R. Saroja
Judges:
05 April, 2017·This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the claimant as against the award of Rs.1,62,361/-, passed in the claim petition filed by him, for the injuries sustained in the accident, which occurred on 30.03.2014, when he was hit by a motor cycle, driven by the 1st respondent and insured wi...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.