Mohammed Abdul Aleem And Anr vs The Greater Municipal Corporation Of Hyderabad
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
31 October, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITIION No. 19914 OF 2008. ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hearing on 28.10.2014, none appeared for the petitioners and hence the matter was directed to be listed for today under the caption ‘For Orders’. Even to day also, though the matter...
High Court Of Telangana
Rajesh Kumar Vyas vs Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
31 October, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITIION No. 19489 OF 2008. ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. No counter affidavit is filed even after lapse of six years of filing the Writ Petition. The petitioner states that he is t...
High Court Of Telangana
Kothri Jewellers vs Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
31 October, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 20152 OF 2008 ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2. It is represented by learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the first and second ...
High Court Of Telangana
Valluri Siva Kameswara Rao vs The Government Of A P And Others
Judges: A V Sesha Sai
31 October, 2014·RESPONDENTS ORDER: It is submitted by Smt. V. Dyumani, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Sree Rama Constructions vs The Asst City Planner
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
31 October, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITIION No. 19871 OF 2008. ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. The petitioner is a partnership firm. It entered into an agreement of sale cum General Power of Attorney with the original o...
High Court Of Telangana
Mekala Srinivasulu vs Kalvakole Ushenaiah And Others
Judges: A V Sesha Sai
31 October, 2014·1. Kalvakole Ushenaiah, and others. RESPONDENTS ORDER: This writ petition challenges the order dated 26.10.2009 passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge-cum-Election Tribunal, at Kollapur, Mahabubnagar District in O.P.No.12 of 2006. By virtue of the said order, the learned Junior Civil Judge dismiss...
High Court Of Telangana
B Prasad vs The State Of A P And Others
Judges: A V Sesha Sai
31 October, 2014·B. Prasad PETITIONER AND 1. The State of A.P. rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, A.P. Hyderabad, and others. RESPONDENTS ORDER: It is submitted by Sri G. Purushotham Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for ...
High Court Of Telangana
B Madhukar Reddy vs Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Co Ltd And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
31 October, 2014·.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Raja Gopallavan Tayi Counsel for the respondents: -- The court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the grievance that the respondents have been demanding electricity consumption charges at three times the normal electricity ...
High Court Of Telangana
Vishnumolakala Lakshmi Narayana vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
31 October, 2014·…Petitioner …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.P.Rajkumar Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Energy The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in erecting a transformer over the petitioner’s vacant land situated...
High Court Of Telangana
Padala Surya Nageswara Rao vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
31 October, 2014·…Petitioner …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mrs.K.V.Rajasree Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies (AP) The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3 in not considering the petitioner’s represent...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.