M/S Mahender Rice Industry vs The Commissioner Of Civil Supplies
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
27 November, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos. 80, 82, 83 and 84 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for the respondents. These four Writ Petitions are being disposed of by this common order in view challenge made to the pro...
High Court Of Telangana
K Srinivasa Rao vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
27 November, 2014·Heard. 2. This writ petition is filed alleging that respondent No.3 is not investigating Crime No.26 of 2014 though the said crime was registered as early as on 10.05.2014. 3. Learned Government Pleader has received instructions which state that after registration of the said crime, investigation wa...
High Court Of Telangana
Vazeer Satish Goud vs Raghavendra Colony And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
27 November, 2014·DATED: 27.11.2014 Between: Vazeer Satish Goud … Appellant And Raghavendra Colony Welfare Association and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.1455 of 2014 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri ...
High Court Of Telangana
Makka Maseedu Committee vs The Govt Of Ap
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
27 November, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 7534 OF 2008 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent. The petitioner states that it is a registered society under the Societies Registration Act registered in the year 2007 a...
High Court Of Telangana
Chakali Govindu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: P Naveen Rao
27 November, 2014·M. Sidda Reddy, S/o. M. Timma Reddy, Hindu, Aged about 59 years, Occ: Agriculturist, R/o. Peddineni Kalva Village, RAyavaram (S.O), T. Sundupalli Mandal, Rayachotty Taluk, YSR Kadapa District-516 129. .. Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department,...
High Court Of Telangana
Raghavendra Dwacra Group vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
27 November, 2014·(W.P.No.23925 of 2014) Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies (AP) (W.P.No.23925 of 2014) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petitions are taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. These three...
High Court Of Telangana
U Bheemanna vs The A P State Road Transport Corporation And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
27 November, 2014·ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare proceedings No.P4/122/(4)2014-RR, dated 16-6-2014 of respondent No.2 whereby he has forfeited the earnest money deposit of Rs.2,50,000/- paid by the petitioner for participating in the tender. In response to the tender notification issued ...
High Court Of Telangana
M Ranga Babu And Others vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
27 November, 2014·Heard. 2. Petitioners allege that all of them are engaged in the business of aqua culture farming in an extent of Ac.2-00 in survey Nos.958/2 and 957/2 of Kovvali Revenue Village and they also claim to have purchased an additional extent of Ac.4-44 cents. While so, it is alleged that one Bandi Madhu...
High Court Of Telangana
Mohammed Rizwan Ahmed vs The State Of T S Through Public
Judges: C Praveen Kumar
27 November, 2014·The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the Memo of grounds filed herein, and upon hearing the arguments of SRI MOHD ASIF ALI, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of the Public Prosecutor (TS), for the Respondent, the Court made the following. ORDER //TRUE COPY// To ASSISTANT...
High Court Of Telangana
Bheemidi Malla Reddy And Another vs The Government Of Telangana And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
27 November, 2014·ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. November 27, 2014 VILAS ...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.