Mandarekala Gopalu And Two Others vs Smt Chitluri Punyavathi
Judges: C Praveen Kumar Civil
05 June, 2014·…..Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1508 of 2014 ORDER : The defendants in O.S.No.162 of 2011 filed the present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate...
High Court Of Telangana
V Venkateswar Reddy & Others vs The Government Of A P
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
05 June, 2014·HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.26737 of 2009 ORDER: Though counsel for the petitioners is absent, on hearing the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Court feels that this writ petition need not be kept pending for the presence of the learned counsel for the petition...
High Court Of Telangana
C H Prabhakar vs The Apsrtc
Judges: U Durga Prasad Rao
05 June, 2014·e) Issue No.2 which relates to compensation is concerned, the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.41,000/- with interest at 7% per annum from the date of O.P till the date of realization as follows: i) Pain and Suffering - Rs.25,000/- ii) Incidental Expenses - Rs.5,000/- iii) Loss ...
High Court Of Telangana
Mohammed Ali vs Shaik Ibrahim And Another
Judges: Ashutosh Mohunta Civil
05 June, 2014·The petitioner who is the tenant is aggrieved by the order dated 28- 03-2014 passed by the learned IV Additional Rent Controller-cum-XVI Junior Civil Judge, Hyderabad vide which I.A No. 32 of 2012 in R.C No. 63 of 2012 filed under Section 5(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction)...
High Court Of Telangana
C Ramachandra Reddy vs The Tahsildar
Judges: S V Bhatt
05 June, 2014·HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT …Respondents Writ Petition No. 25189 of 2010 O R D E R: The petitioners complain inaction against the 1st respondent in taking action against respondents 2 and 3 under the provisions of A.P.Water, Land and Tree Act, 2002 (for short ‘the Act’). The grievance of the peti...
High Court Of Telangana
David Prem Inba Rajan vs Dr Ch Ashok Huf
Judges: Ashutosh Mohunta Civil
05 June, 2014·The respondent is the plaintiff and the petitioner is the defendant in the aforesaid suit. The respondent filed the suit seeking eviction of the petitioner and for recovery of rents, property tax electrical and water charges and the suit was coming up for filing written statement. At that stage, he ...
High Court Of Telangana
Kalaga Govinda vs The Government Of A P And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
05 June, 2014·ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, learned standing counsel for third respondent as well as learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 and 5. 2. Petitioner states that he is a social worker and espousing the cause of the villagers of U...
High Court Of Telangana
Vallabhneni Bangaraiah vs Panamala Peda Musili
Judges: C V Nagarjuna
05 June, 2014·I have heard Dr. K. Manmadha Rao, learned counsel for the appellant, and perused the record. The appellant filed O.S.No.263 of 2005 for permanent injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property consisting of 0-34 3/8 cents comp...
High Court Of Telangana
M Pandu Ranga Reddy vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: S V Bhatt
05 June, 2014·HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT …Respondents Writ Petition No. 28729 of 2010 O R D E R: Sri G.Venkat Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. The statement is placed on record. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infruc...
High Court Of Telangana
Dr A Vijayalakshmi vs The Director Of Intermediate Education And Others
Judges: R Kantha Rao
05 June, 2014·…Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.14487 OF 2000 ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. There is no representation for the respondents. The writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent ...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.