Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Segyama Agamma W/O vs The Government Of India And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
23 July, 2014·4. Petitioner applied for pension in the year 1997 claiming that he was one of the freedom fighters fought against the Nizam Government. By order 28.6.2010 pension was granted to the petitioner w.e.f., 26.04.2010. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the scheme formulated in the year 1...
High Court Of Telangana
Nagothi Nagarju vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
23 July, 2014·...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. C. SHANMUKHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (AP) MR. S. LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY For GVMC The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that his application seeking pattadar passbooks and title deeds wit...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Moravaneni Bajamma vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
23 July, 2014·… Respondents This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 19224 of 2009 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) Learned counsel for the petitioner upon instructions subm...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Sri Kanakadurga Dalitha Civil vs The Vice Chairman &M D Apsrtc
Judges: R Kantha Rao
23 July, 2014·The facts require to be considered in all these three writ petitions are identical and the issues involved for determination are also identical. Therefore, all the three writ petitions are disposed of by a common order. The brief facts necessary for considering the writ petitions may be stated as fo...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Sri Kanakadurga Dalitha Civil vs The Vice Chairman &M D Apsrtc
Judges: R Kantha Rao
23 July, 2014·The facts require to be considered in all these three writ petitions are identical and the issues involved for determination are also identical. Therefore, all the three writ petitions are disposed of by a common order. The brief facts necessary for considering the writ petitions may be stated as fo...
High Court Of Telangana
Sri Ram Ravindra vs The National Institute Of Technology
Judges: A Rajasheker Reddy
23 July, 2014·.. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Writ Petition No.18331 of 2014 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed challenging the tender notification No.NITW/CS-2/2014-15, dated 26-06-2014 on the ground of not terminating the contract of the petitioner by issuing notice for termination...
High Court Of Telangana
Kodamanchili Ramakrishna vs The Vice Chairman & Managing Director
Judges: R Kantha Rao
23 July, 2014·ORDER: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in orally asking the petitioner not to c...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.