S Jayarami Reddy And vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
19 December, 2014·…Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Mr.JUMV.Prasad Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue (AP) The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed with the grievance that respondent No.4 has not been entertaining the sale deeds sought to be presented by the petitioners for r...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Ganapathi Minerals vs The State Of Telangana
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
19 December, 2014·. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri V.L.Surendra Counsel for the Respondents: Sri P.Vinod Kumar The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents, in not granting a reasonable number of instalments to the petitioner fo...
High Court Of Telangana
Shaik Rasheed vs The State Of A P
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
19 December, 2014·. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Rajanikanth Jwala Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in not passing orders on the stay application filed by th...
High Court Of Telangana
K Muni Reddy vs The State Of A P
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
19 December, 2014·.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.N.Subba Rao Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue (AP) The court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.4 in not receiving the document presented by the petitioner for r...
High Court Of Telangana
Pidikiti Sailaja vs The State Of A P
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
19 December, 2014·ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2, in not passing order on the stay application filed by the petitioner against the order passed by respondent No.3, confirming the order of respondent No.2, whereby the petitioner’s fair price shop authorizatio...
High Court Of Telangana
The State Of Telangana And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
19 December, 2014·...RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard. 2. Petitioner, who is a Field Officer, was suspended pending enquiry and a show cause notice was issued to him on 23.09.2014 pointing out the allegations against him and giving him opportunity to appear in person and present his version in d...
High Court Of Telangana
Mohan Dharavath vs The English And Foreign Languages University And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
19 December, 2014·“I have heard the case at length. During the midst of the hearing, it has fallen from the Court that it is in fitness of things that respondent No.1-University stands on the assurance given by it in the counter-affidavit filed in W.P.No.15311 of 2014. Sri A. Ravinder Reddy, learned Standing Counsel ...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited vs The Government Of A P And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
19 December, 2014·Under clause 2 dealing with the covenants of lessor, clause (e) provided as follows: (e) The Lessor has no objection for sub-leasing the Demised Premises only to HPCL as mentioned in Clause 1(e). Further, the agreed clause under 3(a) of the lease deed provided as follows: “(a) The lessee is permitte...
High Court Of Telangana
Mohan Dharavath vs The English And Foreign Languages University And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
19 December, 2014·“I have heard the case at length. During the midst of the hearing, it has fallen from the Court that it is in fitness of things that respondent No.1-University stands on the assurance given by it in the counter-affidavit filed in W.P.No.15311 of 2014. Sri A. Ravinder Reddy, learned Standing Counsel ...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt T Bhuvaneswari vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
19 December, 2014·(c) The impugned order is, apparently, questioned on the ground that the shifting is ordered without any valid reasons and the Commissioner has not exercised the powers in accordance with Rule 28 of the Rules. Hence, the present writ petition. 4. To support the averments in the writ petition, learne...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.