P Seetharamaiah And Others vs Rajeev Gandhi University Of Knowledge Technology Rgukt And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
17 December, 2014·ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in allowing respondent No.3 to participate in the tender pertaining to provision of catering services in respondent No.2-college in pursuance of tender notification bearing No.Ref:RGUKT/Proc/Catering(AP...
High Court Of Telangana
A Sudha Srinivas vs The A P Srtc
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
17 December, 2014·. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri E.Maruthi Raja Counsel for the Respondents: Sri S.V.Ramana The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.4 to 6, in not considering the petitioner’s representations, dated 16.07.2...
High Court Of Telangana
Jesus And Mary Educational Society vs Southern Regional Committee And Another
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
17 December, 2014·Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner’s educational society applied to the first respondent for grant of recognition for running D.EL.Ed course. On the said application, the first respondent pointed out certain deficiencies and required the petitioner to rectify the same withi...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Kakatiya Granites Pvt Limited vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Another
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
17 December, 2014·Heard learned counsel for the parties. According to the petitioner, she applied for a quarry lease for an extent of two hectors in Sy.No. 23 of Girijepalli village Santhamaguluru Mandal, Prakasam district. The second respondent issued a notice dated 8.2.2010 to the petitioner stating that ...
High Court Of Telangana
Meka Bhanu Prakash vs The State Of Telangana And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
17 December, 2014·Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Mr. Pottigari Sridhar Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1 : Assistant Government Pleader for Education Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3 : Mr. K.V. Raghuveer Counsel for respondent No.4 : Mr. A. Abhishekh Reddy The Court made the following : ORDER: These three Writ ...
High Court Of Telangana
Meka Bhanu Prakash vs The State Of Telangana And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
17 December, 2014·Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Mr. Pottigari Sridhar Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1 : Assistant Government Pleader for Education Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3 : Mr. K.V. Raghuveer Counsel for respondent No.4 : Mr. A. Abhishekh Reddy The Court made the following : ORDER: These three Writ ...
High Court Of Telangana
B Laxmaiah vs The Apsrtc
Judges: R Kantha Rao
17 December, 2014·This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not continuing the petitioner as conductor in 4th respondent Depot, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and consequently to direct the respondents to continue...
High Court Of Telangana
P Jalandhar Reddy vs The Vice Chairman And Managing Director
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
17 December, 2014·The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, APSRTC, Hyderabad and three others. . Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri S.D.Gowd Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Arvala Rama Rao (Registry shall show the name of Sri Aravala Rama Rao as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents subject...
High Court Of Telangana
S Sudhakar vs The State Of Telangana
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
17 December, 2014·. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Bollam Lingaiah Yadav Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Civil Supplies (TS) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3 in not releasing 113.96 quintals of rice worth Rs.2,05...
High Court Of Telangana
Vankayalapati Srinivasa Rao vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: P Naveen Rao
17 December, 2014·THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.38808 of 2014 ORDER : Learned Counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the remedies available to them. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismis...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.