The Andhra Pradesh State Seeds Development Corpn Ltd vs C Roop Kumar And Another
Judges: G Chandraiah, Challa Kodanda Ram
29 April, 2014·As could be seen from the operative portion of the impugned order, the 2nd respondent herein was directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the writ petitioner by passing appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and till...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Green Dale Shop vs The Commissioner Of Municipal Corporation Of Hyderabad & Another
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
29 April, 2014·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the 1st respondent. 2. This writ petition was filed challenging the notice dated 31.08.2006 issued by the 2nd respondent calling for the petitioner to pay advertisement fee stated therein in favour of the 2nd responden...
High Court Of Telangana
Creamline Dairy Products Ltd vs The Municipal Corporation Of Hyderabad
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
29 April, 2014·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for respondents 1 and 2. 2. This writ petition was filed challenging the notice dated 18.08.2006 issued by the 3rd respondent calling for the petitioner to pay advertisement fee stated therein in favour of the 3rd responde...
High Court Of Telangana
Sama Uma Lakshmi Kantham vs Yerra Madhu Babu
Judges: B Seshasayana Reddy
29 April, 2014·2 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad. . Respondents/ Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the memo of grounds filed therein, the High Court may be pleased to direct the II Additional J...
High Court Of Telangana
Gummala Perinaidu vs The Station House Officer
Judges: K G Shankar
29 April, 2014·. Respondent Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/ Accused No.2 on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent V.Madugula PS., Visakhapatnam District...
High Court Of Telangana
Chirumamilla Ashok & vs K N
Judges: S Ravi Kumar
29 April, 2014·O R D E R: This petition is filed to quash proceedings in S.C.No.214 of 2013 on the file of IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The main contention of the advocate for petitioners is that there are no allegations against petitioners 3 to 5 who are si...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Neela Rajeshwari vs The State Of A P
Judges: K G Shankar
29 April, 2014·The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M. Achutha Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, the Court made the following. ORDER: “The petitioner is A2. She seeks for grant o...
High Court Of Telangana
B Narayana vs The Commissioner
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
29 April, 2014·B. Narayana ... Petitioner And The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Nizamabad, Nizamabad town and dist & others … Respondents The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.19228 of 2006 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner on 28.04.2014 and even tod...
High Court Of Telangana
Golagabathula Chiranjeevi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges:
29 April, 2014·And: The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. …Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.9882 OF 2013 ORDER: This petition is filed challenging the order in Crl.M.P.No.1643 of 2013 dated 25-4-2013 wherein...
High Court Of Telangana
Pediredla Durgaprasad vs The State Of Ap And Others
Judges: K G Shankar
29 April, 2014·1. The State of AP., through SHO., Pothina Mallaiah Palem PS., Visakhapatnam city, Rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP., Hyderabad 2. Pediredla Aparna W/o P.Durgaprasad, R/o D.No.8-442 Eswari Devinagar, Chinagadili, Visakhapatnam . Respondents/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C....
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.