G.Vijayan
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
16 October, 2014·The petitioner is the purchaser of a property from the 5th respondent. A mortgage was created on the property of the 5th respondent, by the 5th respondent himself as against a loan availed by respondents 3 and 4, from the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent on default being c...
High Court Of Kerala
Govindan AyyappanUnni Ayyappan
Judges: P N Ravindran, P B Suresh Kumar
16 October, 2014·P.N. Ravindran,J.This appeal is by the defendant in O.S.No.55 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Ottapalam. O.S.No.55 of 1999 was tried and disposed of along with O.S.No.53 of 1999 wherein also the very same appellant was joined as the defendant. Both the suits were decre...
High Court Of Kerala
Petitioner/Defendant Pourasthia Kaldaya Suriyani Sabha
Judges: V Chitambaresh
16 October, 2014·The building owned by the respondent is obviously exempted from the provisions of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The same is evident by SRO Nos. 435/1992 and 769/1996 which have been upheld in Christ The King Cathedral Vs. John Ancheril [2001(2) KLT 946 (SC)]. The cou...
High Court Of Kerala
G.Sathish Kumar
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
16 October, 2014·The petitioner challenges a suspension order in the writ petition. The learned counsel for the respondent Bank would submit that pending the writ petition, final orders have been passed on 10.03.2014, dismissing the petitioner from the service of the respondent Bank. The petitioner contends that an...
High Court Of Kerala
K.P.Sunny
Judges: P R Ramachandra Menon
16 October, 2014·Referring to the default on the part of the borrowers, the respondent Bank filed O.A. No.387 of 2011 before the DRT, Ernakulam, wherein the petitioner and his wife have been arrayed as defendants. The defendants in the O.A. were set exparte on 15.05.2012 and subsequently the O.A. was allowed ...
High Court Of Kerala
Meera Paul
Judges: A Muhamed Mustaque
16 October, 2014·This Writ Petition is filed for a direction to the respondents to effect mutation in respect of the property covered in Re-Sy. No. 80/17-3 of Pattimattom Village of Kunnathunadu Taluk.2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that the revenue recovery proceedings were ini...
High Court Of Kerala
Vodafone Cellular Ltd
Judges: A Muhamed Mustaque
16 October, 2014·Petitioner is the 3rd and 4th opposite party in CC 47/2012 before Kerala State Consumer Disputes - Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram. During the trial, DW1 was examined. The petitioner could not cross-examine DW1. Petitioner sought an opportunity to cross-examine DW1. That was declined...
High Court Of Kerala
Vanchiyoor
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
16 October, 2014·1. Petitioner is aggrieved with the interdiction made by the Joint Registrar by the impugned order, Ext.P3, to an appointment to the post of Secretary. The interdiction made by the second respondent was on a complaint by the third respondent. The third respondent is a person, who was dismissed from...
High Court Of Kerala
K.S.Satheesh Kumar
Judges: Dama Seshadri Naidu
16 October, 2014·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 apart from perusing the records. Since the issue lies in a narrow compass, this Court proposes to dispose of the writ petition at the admission stage itself. 2. Briefly stated, the petitioner, ...
High Court Of Kerala
S.Kiran
Judges: Dama Seshadri Naidu
16 October, 2014·The petitioner, an Inspector, Bomb Detection Squad of the Railway Protection Force, Thiruvananthapuram, filed the present writ petition assailing Ext.P4 suspension order passed by the 4th respondent. 2. Indian Railways has the distinction of being the largest civilian employer in the world, ...
High Court Of Kerala
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.