Muraleedharan vs State Of Kerala
Judges: K Surendra Mohan
21 October, 2014·The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. Hence this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.Sd/-K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE.AV /True Copy/ P.A to Judge...
High Court Of Kerala
Shibu.K.N
Judges: A K Jayasankaran Nambiar
21 October, 2014·The petitioner is the registered owner of a stage carriage bearing registration No.KEK/3169. It is his case that the vehicle completed 15 years of age in 2003 but, well prior to that date, it had ceased to be functional and hence it was garaged with effect from 1.1.2002. The peti...
High Court Of Kerala
Kuriakose.P.J Pulikottil vs Joint Regional Transport Officer Sub Regional
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
21 October, 2014·In view of the decision reported in Musthaffa v. Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector [2014(1) KLT 575], the subject matter raised in the above writ petition does not survive. Hence the writ petitions are dismissed, following the aforesaid judgment.Sd/-K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. To Ju...
High Court Of Kerala
Nidhin A.S vs State Of Kerala
Judges: A Muhamed Mustaque
21 October, 2014·Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.Sd/-A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln /True copy/ P.A. to Judge...
High Court Of Kerala
Thankamma KumariGeetha Kumari
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
21 October, 2014·The only prayer is with respect to the recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioners and the hardship insofar as payment of the same, since the petitioners are all housewives without any employment. Obviously, the Writ Petition, filed in the year 2012, is said to be still alive sin...
High Court Of Kerala
Deepthi.J.Prasad H.S.A
Judges: C K Abdul Rehim
21 October, 2014·Dispute is with respect to approval of appointment of the petitioner as H.S.A (Malayalam) in the 5th respondent's school, with effect from 01-06-2005. She was appointed against the retirement vacancy of one Sri. K. Gopalan Nair, who was a protected teacher appointed in the 5th responde...
High Court Of Kerala
C.B.Sureshkumar
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
21 October, 2014·The petitioner was aggrieved by the variation granted to the 4th respondent.2. The learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent submits that the 4th respondent is no more and it is not clear as to who is operating on the permit as of now. It is also noticed that there was an interim...
High Court Of Kerala
M/S.Blue Lagoon Real Estate Private vs State Of Kerala
Judges: K Surendra Mohan
21 October, 2014·The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging Ext.P3 notice by which the 3rd respondent has informed that the application for building permit could not be considered for the reasons noted therein. According to the petitioner, the objection that has been noted as Serial No.4 is unsustainab...
High Court Of Kerala
V.Geetha vs State Of Kerala
Judges: Dama Seshadri Naidu
21 October, 2014·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3, apart from perusing the record. Since the issue lies in a narrow compass, this Court proposes to dispose of the writ petition at the admission stage itself. 2. Briefly stated, the petitioner ...
High Court Of Kerala
Lalitha
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
21 October, 2014·The Counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the respondent Bank submits that subsequent to the interim order passed in the above writ petition, there was a One Time Settlement scheme, which was granted by the respondent Bank and availed by the petitioner; who satisfied the entire ...
High Court Of Kerala
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.