Ulahannan P.T
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
17 November, 2014·The petitioners were aggrieved by the super session order issued at Ext.P2. The primarily the allegation against Ext.P2 is that, there was no notice before super session was ordered. In any event, the petitioners' disqualifications in the elections were stayed by an interim order passed by this Co...
High Court Of Kerala
M/S.Air India Limited
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
17 November, 2014·The petitioner is aggrieved with Ext.P9 order of the Central Government dated 26.3.2014 where the issue as to the “justification of the wages demanded by the Union” was referred to the third respondent for adjudication. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in fact the issue o...
High Court Of Kerala
P.A
Judges: Dama Seshadri Naidu
17 November, 2014·The writ petition concerns itself with the issue of providing pensionary benefits to those employees who voluntarily retired during the years 2006-2007 under a Scheme called ‘Exit Option Scheme’. 2. The facts in brief are that all the petitioners, while working in the respondent Bank, an associate B...
High Court Of Kerala
Suresh.M vs State Bank
Judges: P R Ramachandra Menon
17 November, 2014·The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:“(i) call for the records leading to the Reveneu Recovery Proceedings under Exhibit P-1 Demand Notice and issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, to quash Exhibit P-1 Demand Notice in RR/2013/3...
High Court Of Kerala
A.Janardhanan
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
17 November, 2014·Both the counsel submits that the matter might have been settled. However, if any amounts are due, it is directed that the recovery, if not already concluded, shall be kept in abeyance on condition of the petitioner settling the entire loan in six equal monthly instalments. The respondent-Bank shall...
High Court Of Kerala
Ravi.T.M
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
17 November, 2014·The petitioner sought for the disqualification of the fifth respondent, which he alleges on the basis of a default having been committed by the fifth respondent.The petitioner submits that he is not pressing that relief now since the term of the committee will come to an end and an election is alrea...
High Court Of Kerala
K.R.Venugopalan vs Indian Rare Earths
Judges: C K Abdul Rehim
17 November, 2014·Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter involved in this writ petition has become infructuous.Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.Sd/-C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE./True Copy/ SKV P.A. To Judge...
High Court Of Kerala
Kerala State vs Smt S.Jayalatha
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
17 November, 2014·1. Petitioner KSRTC is aggrieved with Ext.P1 order of the Tribunal.The issue agitated before the Tribunal was with respect to a grant of permit to the third respondent. Admittedly, even going by Ext.P1 order, there was an objection as to overlap of the notified scheme. The total route length was 30...
High Court Of Kerala
M.S.Suja vs State Of Kerala
Judges: P R Ramachandra Menon
17 November, 2014·The issues involved in both these cases are similar and hence they are dealt with together. The applications preferred by the petitioners to put up a commercial cum residential building came to be considered and rejected by the 2nd respondent as per Ext.P5 order dated 17.10.2014 stating that Detail...
High Court Of Kerala
A.A.George Valiyakariyil House vs State Of Kerala
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
17 November, 2014·The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging Exts.P3, P9 and P11 orders. Ext.P3 is admittedly an order passed under section 32 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, superseding the Managing Committee elected to office and continuing thereon. An appeal was filed fr...
High Court Of Kerala
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.