Objectors
Judges: Antony Dominic, Anil K Narendran
17 November, 2014·ANTONY DOMINIC, J.Counsel appearing for the cross objector states that the Cross-Objection may be dismissed as not pressed. Accordingly, the Cross-Objection is dismissed as not pressed.ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE skj...
High Court Of Kerala
Dr.Jithu Zacharia vs
Judges: A Muhamed Mustaque
17 November, 2014·The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed. The submission is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/-A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge.dpk /True copy/ PS to Judge....
High Court Of Kerala
Dr.Fincy.M.D vs State Of Kerala
Judges: A Muhamed Mustaque
17 November, 2014·The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed. The submission is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/-A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge.dpk /True copy/ P.S. To Judge....
High Court Of Kerala
K.R Vijayakumar
Judges: Thottathil B Radhakrishnan, Babu Mathew P Joseph
17 November, 2014·Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents.The appellant-petitioner was transferred as per order of the Regional Manager, Supplyco, Kottayam from Changanacherry Depot to Kottayam Depot of Supplyco. When the appe...
High Court Of Kerala
Ganesh Kumar M
Judges: Ashok Bhushan, A M Shaffique
17 November, 2014·Ashok Bhushan, Ag.CJ. These two Writ Appeals have been filed against the judgment dated 11th August, 2014 in W.P. (C ) 20753/2014. The Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner, Ganesh Kumar.2. In the Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the proceedings initiated by the Bank under the SARFAE...
High Court Of Kerala
Subhash Chandra Bose vs State Of Kerala
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
17 November, 2014·1. Petitioner is aggrieved with the sale proceedings initiated by the respondent bank for committing default in remitting the loan amount. Learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that the sale has already been set aside.2. Considering the confined prayer made for instalments, if no third par...
High Court Of Kerala
G.V.J.Properties Private Limited
Judges: A K Jayasankaran Nambiar
17 November, 2014·It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp...
High Court Of Kerala
Padmavathy
Judges: Ashok Bhushan, A M Shaffique
17 November, 2014·Shaffique, J.Challenging the judgment dated 23-10-2014 in W.P. (C ) No. 2783 of 2013, the petitioner has filed this Writ Appeal. The writ petition is filed seeking to quash Exts. P7 and P8 proceedings of the 3rd respondent. Ext. P7 is the proceedings issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer,...
High Court Of Kerala
K.M.Raju
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
17 November, 2014·Petitioner's only contention is that Ext.P3 representation submitted by him has not been considered so far. The objection is with respect to the timings of the third respondent and additional fourth respondent. Learned counsel for the additional fourth respondent submits that objections we...
High Court Of Kerala
Premjith V.K
Judges: Ashok Bhushan, A M Shaffique
17 November, 2014·Shaffique, J. This appeal is filed by the petitioner challenging the judgment dated 10-10-2014 in W.P. ( C) No. 14101 of 2013. By the impugned judgment, the Writ Petition filed by the appellant challenging the order passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal in MVAA No. 332/2010 dated 30-12-...
High Court Of Kerala
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.