Kunhippa
Judges: K Surendra Mohan
21 May, 2014·The petitioners are owners cum drivers of Autorickshaws. They have been granted contract carriage permits to operate their vehicles. The petitioners have submitted Ext.P8 application seeking variation of their permits. They complain that no orders have been passed thereon till date. The petitione...
High Court Of Kerala
Dr.G.Prabha vs State Of Kerala
Judges: A M Shaffique
21 May, 2014·Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.(sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr...
High Court Of Kerala
Muhammed Shabeer vs State Of Kerala
Judges: K Surendra Mohan
21 May, 2014·The prayer of the petitioner is that, though he has purchased a vehicle bearing Registration No.KL 46-200 from the 3rd respondent, the vehicle has not been transferred to his name despite submitting an application for the purpose.2. According to the learned Government Pleader, his in...
High Court Of Kerala
M.P.Ravindran Nair vs Caso
Judges: P N Ravindran
21 May, 2014·None appears for the petitioner. There was also no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner, when the writ petition was called on for hearing today. Dismissed for default. vps P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE)...
High Court Of Kerala
Kairali Steels
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
21 May, 2014·The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE....
High Court Of Kerala
N.A.Thomas A.Paracka vs State Of Kerala
Judges: P R Ramachandra Menon
21 May, 2014·Petitioners are contractors who were given certain civil works in connection with the Edamalayar Right Bank Main Canal including the work of Cross Drainage. It is stated that, as many as 38 persons were given such contract for completing the work in separate units for an approximate length of 250 m....
High Court Of Kerala
Sarathkumar V.V vs Unnikulam Grama Panchayath
Judges: C T Ravikumar
21 May, 2014·The petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of his application for building permit for construction of a building in the property having an extent of 2.268 Ares comprised in re-survey No.47/1 of Iyyad Desom in Koyilandy Taluk. The said application was rejected as per Ext.P7 order for the reason tha...
High Court Of Kerala
P.M.Hassankutty
Judges: A M Shaffique
21 May, 2014·Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the order passed pursuant to Exts.P4 and P5 before appropriate authorities.Accordingly, granting liberty to file necessary petition before appropriate authorities, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.(sd/-) (A.M....
High Court Of Kerala
T Suresan
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
21 May, 2014·The 2nd petitioner enrolled in a Chit conducted by the 1st respondent and on the petitioner becoming a prized subscriber, amounts were disbursed to the 2nd petitioner on the guarantee executed by the the 1st petitioner. The 2nd petitioner admittedly defaulted the ...
High Court Of Kerala
Sheeba Jameson
Judges: A M Shaffique
21 May, 2014·Petitioners have approached this Court complaining about a common order, Ext.P2 in W.P.C.No.10193 of 2014.2. The learned Government Pleader submits that the petitioners have a right of appeal against the aforesaid order of suspension.3. I.A.No.6036 of 2014 is filed in W.P.C.No.10193 of 2014 whe...
High Court Of Kerala
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.