Girish T S And Others vs State By Women Police Tumakuru And Others
Judges: P S Dinesh Kumar
29 July, 2019·PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT ‘SAHANA’, T.P. KAILASAM ROAD, NEAR SHETTIHALLI GATE RAGHAVENDRA NAGARA SHETTIHALLI GATE TUMKUR – 02. 4. SAHANA T.S. W/O. KALLINATHA H.D. AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS. 5. KALLINATHA H.D. S/O. LATE B. DODDAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. AND: PETITIONER NOS.4 AND 5 ARE R/AT ‘MANOGNA N...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri M Srinivasa vs Sri H N Siddaraju
Judges: B A Patil
29 July, 2019·2. I have heard the learned counsel for the respondent-complainant. Petitioner and his counsel remained absent. Since Criminal Revision Petition cannot be dismissed for default and it has to be heard and decided on merits as such the case was taken on merits. 3. The facts leading ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Rajashekar vs Sri Ravindranath
Judges: S G Pandit Civil
29 July, 2019·THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The parties to the petition have filed a joint memo dated 29-5-2019, which is signed by both the petitioner and respondent and they were also present before this Court. The petitioner and respondent were ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Harishkumar T vs Sri Mahadeva
Judges: B A Patil
29 July, 2019·… Respondent (By Sri K.Prasanna Shetty, Advocate) This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C praying to set aside the judgment dated 17.12.2015 passed by the XV ACMM, Bengaluru in C.C.No.27204/2014 and judgment passed in Criminal Appeal No.37/2016 dated 22.12.2...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Venkatesh B C vs Sri Strategic Marketing And Research Team
Judges: B A Patil
29 July, 2019·2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/accused. The learned counsel for the respondent remained absent. 3. The facts of the case of the complainant before the Court below is that the complainant is dealing with sale of goods namely Phthalic Anhydride and in pursuant to...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Manjunath @ Kali vs The State Of Karnataka
Judges: B A Patil
29 July, 2019·3. The facts leading to the case are that on 01.04.2016 at about 9.45 p.m., a case has been registered alleging that the deceased – Krishnamurthy @ Appi is the younger brother of the husband of the complainant’s father’s sister and was taking care of the business and finances of the compl...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mrs Vimala Ramachandra Adult And Others vs Mrs Manjula D Kairkal And Others
Judges: S G Pandit Civil
29 July, 2019·3. MRS. SUSHEELA KARKERA ADULT, W/O. VAMAN KARKERA, SHILYAN DOOR NO.17-9-563, HIGHLANDS, OPP. TO PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE, KANKANACLY, MANGALORE-575 002. 4. MRS. ARUNA ADULT, D/O. LATE MONAPPA MOHAN SUVARNA, C/O. MRS. VIMALA RAMACHANDRA, GORIGUDDA, MANGALORE-575 002. 5. MR. AMARNATH ADULT, S/O. LATE...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Sumithra Nagaraj vs Sri R Nagaraja Babu
Judges: B A Patil
29 July, 2019·O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent have filed a joint memo reporting the settlement of the matter amicably between the petitioner-accused and the respondent-complainant. The said memo has been signed by both the petitioner-accused and the respondent-complai...
High Court Of Karnataka
Manjunath @ Gudlu Manju vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: John Michael Cunha
29 July, 2019·State of Karnataka, By Jigani Police Station, Anekal Taluk, Represented by its State Public Prosecutor, High Court Building, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Veedhi, Bengaluru – 560 001. … Respondent (By Sri. Vijayakumar Majage, Addl. SPP) This Criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. pra...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.