Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mrs Vimala Ramachandra Adult And Others vs Mrs Manjula D Kairkal And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|29 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT CIVIL REVISION PETITION.No.190 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
1. MRS. VIMALA RAMACHANDRA ADULT, D/O. LATE. MONAPPA MOHAN, SUVARNA, GORIGUDDA, MANGALORE-575 002.
2. MR. JITHENDRA ADULT, S/O. LATE MONAPPA MOHAN SUVARNA, GORIGUDDA, MANGALORE-575 002.
3. MRS. SUSHEELA KARKERA ADULT, W/O. VAMAN KARKERA, SHILYAN DOOR NO.17-9-563, HIGHLANDS, OPP. TO PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE, KANKANACLY, MANGALORE-575 002.
4. MRS. ARUNA ADULT, D/O. LATE MONAPPA MOHAN SUVARNA, C/O. MRS. VIMALA RAMACHANDRA, GORIGUDDA, MANGALORE-575 002.
5. MR. AMARNATH ADULT, S/O. LATE MONAPPA @ MOHAN SUVARNA, GORIGUDDA, MANGALORE-575 002.
6. MR. PRADEEPA ADULT, S/O. LATE MONAPPA @ MOHAN SUVARNA, GORIGUDDA, MANGALORE-575 002.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SACHIN B S, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. MRS. MANJULA D KAIRKAL AGED 89 YEARS, W/O. LATE DATTATHREYA RAO KARKAL, 2. MRS. VANDANA A KAUSHIK AGED 49 YEARS, D/O. LATE. DATTATHREYA RAO KARKAL, BOTH RESIDING AT C/208, "JAMBODARSHAN", KOLDONGRI ROAD, ANDHERI EAST, MUMBAI-400 069.
... RESPONDENTS THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 23.03.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.499/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MANGALURU, D.K. ON HOLDING THAT THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFFS IS NOT BARRED UNDER THE KARNATAKA MULGENI ABOLITION AND CONFERMENT OF OWNERSHIP ON MULGENI TENANTS ACT 2010 AND THE COURT FEE PAID BY THE PLAINTIFFS AS PER SECTION 41[2] OF KARNATAKA COURT FEE AND SUIT VALUATION ACT IS CORRECT AND THIS COURT HAS PECUNIARY JURISDICTION TO TRY THE SUIT.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 24-6-2019, seeking permission to withdraw the petition as the same has become infructuous.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE SMJ
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mrs Vimala Ramachandra Adult And Others vs Mrs Manjula D Kairkal And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
29 July, 2019
Judges
  • S G Pandit Civil