Dr Ramesh Ranganathan Mbbs vs Bgs Appollo Hospital Adichunchanagiri And Others
Judges: John Michael Cunha
12 July, 2019·O R D E R Being aggrieved by the order passed by the IV Addl. Sessions Judge, Mysuru dated 15.12.2015 in Criminal Revision Petition No.94/2015 whereby learned Sessions Judge has allowed the revision petition and set aside the order dated 03.03.2015 in PCR.No.2536/2014 (CC.No.848/2015) passed b...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Krishna Murthy And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: John Michael Cunha
12 July, 2019·2. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE UGRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O VASANTA NILAYA, NEAR AUTO STAND, UPPARAHALLI MAIN ROAD, TUMKUR - 572 102. .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.T. NANAIAH., SR. ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY WOMEN POLICE, TUMKUR REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH C...
High Court Of Karnataka
State Of Karnataka By Police vs Mr Mohammed Sadiq
Judges: Mohammad Nawaz
12 July, 2019·Mr.Mohammed Sadiq, Aged about 31 years, S/o Moidinabba, R/at a1-Badria Manzil, Indiranagara, Haleyangadi, Mangaluru Taluk-574 146. …Respondent This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378(1) & (3) of Cr.P.C. prays to grant leave to appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Land Acquisition Officer Cum Assistant vs Jayalakshmi And Others
Judges: Sreenivas Harish Kumar Civil
11 July, 2019·…Petitioner 3. A.S.Mohanangi, W/o. Sheshappa, D/o. Late U.G. Anandagowda, Aged about 37 years, R/o. Ambekkal, Sampaje Village, P.O.Goonadka, Sullia Taluk-574239, Dakshina Kannada District. 4. U.A.Chandrashekhar, S/o. Late U.G.Ananda Gowda, Aged about 34 years, Ulvar House, Aranthodu Village and ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri V Sanjeeva vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: P B Bajanthri
11 July, 2019·ORDER In the instant petition, petitioner has questioned the validity of endorsement dated 14.2.2013, by which his grievance is relating to retrospective promotion to the cadre of Librarian from 17.8.2010 to 13.3.2003 has been turned down with reference to policy decision of the State that th...
High Court Of Karnataka
K Puttanna Alias Puttaraju vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Mohammad Nawaz
11 July, 2019·5. The trial Court framed charges against accused Nos.1 to 8 for the offence punishable under Sections. 498- A, 420, 313, 114, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC. 6. Before the trial Court, the prosecution got examined P.W.1 to P.W.11 and got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P7 and M.O.1 to M.O.3. The de...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Beeraiah And Others vs The Sub Inspector Of Police Law And Order And Others
Judges: John Michael Cunha
11 July, 2019·3. Sri H.L.Parameshwara S/o late H.S.Lakshminarayana Aged about 53 years R/at No.20, ‘B’ Block Jaki Quarters Lalithamahal Road Mysuru-12. 4. Sri A.S.Somesh S/o late Siddegowda Aged about 48 years Managing Partner M/s. Chamundi Developers R/at No.66, 3rd Block, Jayalakshmipuram Mysuru-570 012. (By Sr...
High Court Of Karnataka
P T Raghu Kumar vs State Of Karnataka Department Of Municipal And Others
Judges: P B Bajanthri
11 July, 2019·1. STATE OF KARNATAKA … PETITIONER DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 REPTD. BY ITS SECRETARY 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSORE DISTRICT 3. PERIYAPATTANA PATTAN PANCHAYATH PERIYAPATANA MYSORE DISTRICT ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SREEDHAR N.HEGDE, ADV. FOR R1 & R2 SR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Kapanaiah vs Smt Shivamma And Others
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao Regular
11 July, 2019·1. Smt. Shivamma, W/o Siddaiah, Aged about 49 years, 2. Smt. Sakamma, W/o late Nanjaiah, Aged about 71 years, Both are R/at Earanadasi Koppal Village, Hamlet of Gagenahally Village, Hunsur Taluk, Mysore District – 571 105. 3. Sri.Kempananjaiah, S/o late Gendaiah, Aged about 59 years, 4. Smt. Lat...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri C S Sheshagiri vs Smt Jayalakshmi @ Jayalakshmamma
Judges: Sreenivas Harish Kumar
11 July, 2019·5. Sri. Rameshchandra, the learned counsel for respondent argued for sustaining the findings of the trial court. His argument is that the agreement does not disclose delivery of possession to the petitioner in part performance of the agreement. Clause 9 of the agreement clearly states the po...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.