Mr Allabaksh vs The Regional Transport Authority Bangalore Rural And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
23 July, 2019·Mr. ALLABAKSH S/O Mr. J.AMANULLA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, TOMATO MERCHANT, M.B. ROAD, KOLAR-563 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI C.M.S.SHARIFF, ADV.) AND: 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BANGALORE RURAL, BDA COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SMT.REHANA BEGUM W/O...
High Court Of Karnataka
Swamy Vivekananda Public School vs State Of Karnataka Principal And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
23 July, 2019·THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R The petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent No.3 to consider the representation of the petitioner seeking permission to conduct Primary and Higher Primary classes for the a...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Manjunath H E vs The Commissioner/Secretary Karnataka Public Service Commission And Others
Judges: P B Bajanthri
23 July, 2019·(By Sri. Narasimha Murthy G.V., Advocate) AND: 1. The Commissioner/Secretary Karnataka Public Service Commission, Udyoga Soudha, Bengaluru – 560 001. 2. The Regional Transport Officer Road Transport Office (RTO), Hassan, Hassan District – 573 201. 3. The Deputy Commissioner Hassan District, Ha...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Tanoji Rao M P vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
23 July, 2019·4. THE THASILDAR, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, CHANNAGIRI-577 213. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V. SHIVAREDDY, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 2.7.2019 ISSUED BY R-3 VIDE ANNEXURE-D. THIS WRIT PETITION...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Abdul Salam vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
23 July, 2019·2. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, E WING, 2ND FLOOR, KENDRIYA SADAN, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 034. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.H.MALLAN GOUD, CGC) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE DISQUALIFICATION OF THE ...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Krishnagiri Estate vs The State Of Karnataka
Judges: L Narayana Swamy, R Devdas Civil
23 July, 2019·M/S.KRISHNAGIRI ESTATE VIJAYAPUR EXTENSION CHICKAMAGALUR – 577 101 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI.S.C.DHARMARAJ (MAJOR) 60 YEARS (NOT CLAIMED SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT) (BY SRI.M.THIRUMALESH, ADV.) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA ... PETITIONER...
High Court Of Karnataka
Veto Switchgears & Cables Pvt Ltd And Others vs Mr Raghunath Mallar And Others
Judges: H B Prabhakara Sastry
23 July, 2019·The plaintiff also contended that he placed an order for supply of goods to him with defendant Nos.1 and 2 on 17-09-2010, but the defendants failed to dispatch the goods to him. Thus, the plaintiff being highly dissatisfied with the poor services of defendant Nos.1 and 2, decided to surrender his d...
High Court Of Karnataka
Branch Manager Shriram General Ins Co Ltd vs Sonnegowda And Others
Judges: K Somashekar Mfa
23 July, 2019·4. It is evident from the claim petition that, on 27.07.2010 at about 8.30 p.m., when the claimant was standing at Channarayapatna Bus Stop (Devanahalli Taluk) and waiting for bus in order to go to Vijayapura, at that time, the driver of autorickshaw bearing Registration No. KA.03.8998...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Selvi W/O Dakshina Murthy
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao
23 July, 2019·1.ALAMALEMMA W/O LATE DHANPAL NAIDU SINCE DEAD APPELLANT AND RESPONDENT NO.2 ARE TREATED AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF R-1 2.RAJESHWARI, W/O DHARMALINGAM .M, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O KABALIKATTE, POST DEVARAHALLI, BHADRAVATHI TALUK-577301 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT 3. AMULAMMA W/O DHANPAL NAIDU AGED 84 YEARS R/O K...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri T A Honnaiah @ Thammanna vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
23 July, 2019·ORDER The petitioner herein is 5th respondent in WP.No.34358/2012 and WP.No.42714/2012, which were filed by one Somashekare Gowda and 3 others against the State and others, where petitioner’s father is 3rd respondent and petitioners’ brothers were respondents 4, 6 and 7. So far as petitioner ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.