Smt Dr Geetha W/O Suresh vs Suresh
Judges: Ashok G Nijagannavar
22 April, 2019·SURESH S/O. MALLESHAPPA KATIGERE AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT M.S. ACHEGOW, CHADCHAN VILLAGE, INDI TALUK, VIJAYAPURA – 535 419. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DIWAKARA N., ADV., ) THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO TRANSFER THE PETITION IN M.C.NO...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt K N Umadevi W/O vs Sri N C Prakash
Judges: Ashok G Nijagannavar
22 April, 2019·SRI.N C PRAKASH S/O LATE NEELAKANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS BUSINESS R/O.MARLU KRUPA SIDDESHWARA 5TH MAIN, SUBHAS NAGAR N.M.C. HOSAME BHADRAVATHI ... RESPONDENT THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.24(1) OF CPC, PRAYING TO A) TRANSFER THE PETITION MC NO. 85/2016 PENDING ON THE FILE OF TH...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Muniswamappa vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: John Michael Cunha
22 April, 2019·SRI. KEMPARAJU, S/O K RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/A 2ND DIVISION, GANGADHARAPURA, 4TH WARD, DODDABALAPURA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, DODDABALLAPURA – 561 203. (BY SRI. C S PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY KODIGEHALLI POLICE, REPRESENTED BY STATION, HOUSE OFFICER, HI...
High Court Of Karnataka
C N Kantharaju And Others vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan District And Others
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
22 April, 2019·3. THE TAHASILDAR HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN-573 201. 4. S.V. KESHAVE GOWDA SON OF VENKATARAMANE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 5. S.E. MALLESHA SON OF EREGOWDA RESIDENTS OF SATYAMANGALA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT-573 201. 6. S.R. KRISHNE GOWDA SON OF LATE RANGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 76 Y...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri A C Subbaiah And Others vs The Commissioner Mysuru Urban Development Authority And Others
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
22 April, 2019·... APPELLANTS (BY SRI:S.ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JLB ROAD, MYSURU-570 028. 2. THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JLB ROAD, MYSURU-570 005. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT MYSURU-570 001. 4. THE TAHASILDAR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Veena M H W/O Mohan Kumar vs Mohan Kumar
Judges: Ashok G Nijagannavar
22 April, 2019·MOHAN KUMAR K.C. S/O. CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT KERAGODI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, TIPTUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 201 ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI.BHANU H.M., ADV. ) THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.24 OF CPC, PRAYING TO A) TO TRANSFER THE MC NO.49/2017 IS PENDING O...
High Court Of Karnataka
Roshan Zaheer M K vs The Chief Manager And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
22 April, 2019·2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF MYSORE, …PETITIONER 2ND FLOOR, GRADUATES CO-OP SOCEITY BUILDING, KUVEMPUR ROAD, JAIL CIRCLE, SHIMOGA DISTRICT, PIN – 577 001. 3. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF MYSORE, MEGARAVALLI BRANCH, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT, PIN – 577 424. (BY MS.APARNA R. FOR …...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt B Sangeetha vs Sri L Srinath
Judges: Ashok G Nijagannavar
22 April, 2019·Sri. L. Srinath, S/o. Laksmanachari, Aged about 41 years, R/at Kalamma Temple Street, Kolar City. ... Respondent This Civil Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying to allow this petition and grant an order transferring petition in M.C.No.34/...
High Court Of Karnataka
C V Charitable Trust vs Mysore Urban Development Authority And Others
Judges: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
22 April, 2019·3. The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Secretary, Urban Development, 4th Floor, Vikas Soudha, Bangalore – 560 001. … Respondents (By Sri T.P. Vivekananda, Advocate for R-1 & R-2; Smt. B.P. Radha, AGA for R-3) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt P Gayathri W/O Madhava Raju vs The Commissioner Bengaluru Development Authority
Judges: S Sujatha
22 April, 2019·THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- O R D E R The petitioner has assailed the endorsement dated 01.10.2004issued by the respondents whereby the site allotted to the petitioner has been cancelled. 2. The petitioner was an allottee o...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.