P K Ponnappa And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath
23 March, 2017·Next > IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 23rd DAY OF MARCH, 2017 Next >...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mohammed Talha Akrami vs Additional Chief Secretary And Principal Secretary And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna, B S Patil
22 March, 2017·ii) that detenue Fazal was involved in attempted smuggling of Rs.76,40,000/- Indian currency from Bengaluru to Sharjah and in this case he had arranged the said money through Hussain and asked Mohammed Imtiyaz Farooque to smuggle out the said amount, so as to give it to one Raees. Moham...
High Court Of Karnataka
Ibrahim Shareff vs Additional Chief Secretary And Principal Secretary And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna, B S Patil
22 March, 2017·4. Mr. Nidheesh Tharol stated that he was in the business of readymade garments at Kozhikode; as he was in need of quick money, he was offered a good opportunity by his childhood friend Mujeeb @ Raja @ King; his work was to carry gold from Dubai to India, for which expenses would be borne by Mujee...
High Court Of Karnataka
State Of Karnataka
Judges: Ravi Malimath
22 March, 2017·1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001 2. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU NORTH ADDITIONAL TALUK YELAHANKA BENGALURU – 560 096 … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT PRAMODHINI KISHAN, HCGP) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AN...
High Court Of Karnataka
Fathima Zohra W/O H Mohammed Iqbal vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna, B S Patil
22 March, 2017·THE JUDGMENT IN THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN RESERVED ON 20/03/2017 AND IT BEING LISTED FOR PRONOUNCEMENT TODAY, NAGARATHNA J., PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R The petitioner is the wife of the detenue, H.Mohammed Iqbal, son of Hasanabba who has been detained under Karnataka P...
High Court Of Karnataka
Railway Recruitment Board And Others vs Shri Prashant Kumar Soni And Others
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao, Jayant Patel
22 March, 2017·ORDER Notice. 2. Mr.Aswin Prabhu, learned Counsel appears for respondent No.1-contesting party who was applicant before the Tribunal. So far as respondent Nos.2 and 3 are concerned, they are as such, proforma respondents, since there were respondents in the main application before the Tribunal and ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Manikchand vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna, B S Patil
22 March, 2017·THIS WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING THAT THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT BE PLEASED TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF HEABIOUS CORPUS TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 TO SECURE THE PRESENCE OF THE DETENUE BEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT. THIS WPHC...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Huchamma And Others vs The Chairman And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath
22 March, 2017·1. The Chairman, Bengaluru Development Authority, Kumar Park West, Bengaluru-560020. 2. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bengaluru Development Authority, Kumar Park West, Bengaluru-560020. ... Respondents (By Sri B.S.Sachin, Adv. for R-2, R-1 is Served & Unrepresented) These writ pet...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.