Dr R Rajanna Professr vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: G Narendar
26 April, 2017·SRI. T.P. RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGAY-ADV FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF QUO-WARRANTO AND REMOVE R-4 FROM THE POST OF REGISTRAR OF THE R-3 - UNIVERSITY. THIS WP COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLL...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Vittala Malakudya vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Udupi District And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath
26 April, 2017·1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KUNDAPURA. 3. THE TAHSILDAR KARKALA TALUK, KARKALA. 4. SMT.V.JAYASHREE AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, W/O BHASKAR, D/O N.SHANKARA KURP, BANDIMATA, KARKALA KASABA VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. 5. SMT.SUVARNA N.JOSHY AG...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Mymunnisa vs The Special Deputy Commissioner Bengaluru District And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath
26 April, 2017·1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU. 3. THE TAHASILDAR K.R.PURAM, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU. 4. MUNIYELLAPPA (SINCE DECEASED) BY HIS L.R. M.RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNIYELLAPPA, R...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Chowdappa vs Smt Chabubai W/O Late Babu Rao
Judges: H G Ramesh
26 April, 2017·SMT. CHABUBAI W/O LATE BABU RAO AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS PROPRIETOR SARASWATHI BUILDING NO.585, B.H.ROAD, TIPTUR – 572 201 DISTRICT TUMKUR ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI G.R.PRAKASH & SMT. RENUKA.J, ADVOCATES) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYIN...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Nandishkumar T D vs The Karnataka Power Transmission Company Limited Cauvery Bhavan And Others
Judges: G Narendar
26 April, 2017·THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING-B GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The learned counsel Smt. Padma S Uttur is directed to take notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 and 2. 2. Issue canvassed in this writ petition has already been considered by ...
High Court Of Karnataka
B J Nagabhushan And Others vs The Deputy Commissioner Chikkamagaluru District And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath
26 April, 2017·4. B.J.VENKATESH S/O LATE B.JANARDHAN BHAT, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O NO.973, 7TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN, RAGHAVENDRA BLOCK, SRINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 050. 5. B.J.SRIRANGA S/O LATE B.JANARDHAN BHAT, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O BASARIKATTE – 577 114 MEGUNDA HOBLI, KOPPA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT. 6. B.J.NA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Saraswathamma W/O Late Muniyappa And Others vs Shri Narayanappa And Others
Judges: H G Ramesh
26 April, 2017·1. SHRI NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE CHENNARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 2. SHRI VENKATESHAPPA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 3. SHRI MUNIRAJAPPA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 4. SHRI GOVINDAPPA S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS 5. SHRI RAJGOPALA S/O LATE VENKATASWAMY AGED ABO...
High Court Of Karnataka
H V Gururaj vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, P S Dinesh Kumar
26 April, 2017·1. State of Karnataka Represented by Chief Secretary Vidhana Soudha Bengaluru – 560 001 2. The Secretary to Government Dept. of Commerce & Industries Vikasa Soudha Bengaluru – 560 001 3. The Director Department of Mines & Geology Khanija Bhavan Race Course Road Bengaluru – 560 001 4. The Senior Geol...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Sri Kalabairaveshwara Recreation Association vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: A S Bopanna
26 April, 2017·O R D E R Learned Government Advocate to accept notice for respondents No.1 to 7 and file memo of appearance in four weeks. 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for issue of mandamus or any other appropriate writ in the manner as has been sought in the petition. 3. The issue which has be...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Someshwari D/O C And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: G Narendar
26 April, 2017·THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING-B GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and respondents. 2. A perusal of the communication by the respondent No.1 dated 05/11.06.2013 indicates that upon a request mad...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.