Mangroo vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
21 September, 2021·Sri Kush Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the statutory time limit for deciding the said proceedings provided under Section 24 (3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has long expired. The only prayer made by Sri Kush Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner is that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alka And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
21 September, 2021·Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction upon respondents not to harass the petitioners. The State Government on 31.08.2019 has come out with the Government Order pursuant to the direction of Apex Court in case of Shakti Vahini Vs. Union of India and othe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Kokila Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
21 September, 2021·Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Notice need not to be sent to the private respondents, at this stage. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon respondent no. 2 to conclude the mutation...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bala Lakhandar And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
21 September, 2021·Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Heard Sri R.S. Kushwaha, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Notice need not to be sent to the private respondent, at this stage. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon respondent no. 2 to conclu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Dimpal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
21 September, 2021·Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Heard Sri I.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Notice need not to be sent to the private respondents, at this stage. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon respondent no. 2 to conc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Toshi Chaodhary And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
21 September, 2021·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23619 of 2021 Petitioner :- Smt. Toshi Chaodhary And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Learned counsel for petitioners, after arguing for some time, on i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Poonam Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
21 September, 2021·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23615 of 2021 Petitioner :- Poonam Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dileep Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. The grievance of petitioner is that Case No. T- 20210203040449...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Madhubala vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
21 September, 2021·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23607 of 2021 Petitioner :- Smt. Madhubala Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avinash Chandra Srivastava Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Sri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel appeari...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Maharaj Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
21 September, 2021·Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Sri Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a prayer for restoring the possession of the petitioners over the Abadi land. Sri Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the submission of learned Standing Counsel that the petitioners h...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Phool Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
21 September, 2021·Heard Sri Jay Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Impleadment Application dated 13.09.2013 in Revision no. 353 of 2008, Computer no. C2008010000627 (Ramesh Chandra Vs Rajesh) under Sec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.