Smt Nisha And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pritinker Diwaker
29 October, 2021·Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. Heard Shri Subhash Chandra Pandey, counsel for the petitioners and Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents. The writ petitioners, who are both major and practicing different religious faith, are stated to be in live-in-relations...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Dimpi Vishwakarma And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Umesh Kumar
29 October, 2021·The petitioners claim that they are adults and living together out of their own freewill. It is stated that for the said reason, the private respondent and his other family members have got annoyed and there is serious danger to the lives of the petitioners as they are being threatened and harassed....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abhiraj Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rajeev Misra
29 October, 2021·Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. 1. Heard Mr. Chandra Bhan Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing counsel representing respondents 1 to 3. 2. Perused the record. 3. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for a writ of mandamus commanding ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Shekhar Chauhan vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Alok Mathur
29 October, 2021·1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondent no. 3 to 5 are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Anjana And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Umesh Kumar
29 October, 2021·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28304 of 2021 Petitioner :- Smt. Anjana And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 3 stat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Chandrarekha vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Alok Mathur
29 October, 2021·1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondent nos. 4 to 6 are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner prayin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anjani Kumari And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Umesh Kumar
29 October, 2021·The petitioners claim that they are adults and living together out of their own freewill. It is stated that for the said reason, the private respondent and his other family members have got annoyed and there is serious danger to the lives of the petitioners as they are being threatened and harassed....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sitara vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
29 October, 2021·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28294 of 2021 Petitioner :- Sitara Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Dubey,Vipul Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. As prayed, list after two weeks. Order Date :- 29.10.2021 V.S.Singh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Ashare And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rajeev Misra
29 October, 2021·Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. 1. Heard Mr. Gulab Chandra, learned counsel for petitioners, learned Standing counsel representing respondents 1 & 2 and Mr. Azad Rai, learned counsel representing respondent-3. 2. Perused the record. 3. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nilam Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
29 October, 2021·Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. The sole grievance of the petitioner is that the Election Petition being Case No. T202115060103671 of 2021, under Section 12(c) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, was not being decided and, therefore, a prayer for a direction has been made that the case be decided expeditious...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.