Smt. Preeti Jain vs State Of U.P. An Another
Judges: Rajeev Misra
08 February, 2021·Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the same. Prayer made is allowed. The application is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh. Certified copy/ of impugned order and charge sheet may be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after obtaining photo copy of the s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shakeel Ahmad And 2 Others vs The Waqf Tribunal Lucknow And 3 ...
Judges: Prakash Padia
08 February, 2021·After some argument Sri Kshitij Shailendra, learned counsel for the petitioners confines his prayer only to the extent to direct the Waqf Tribunal-respondent no.1 to decide the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC itself filed in Suit No.115 of 2016 expeditiously. This prayer has not been objecte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rukhsana And 4 Others vs Mohd. Mustqeem And Another
Judges: Prakash Padia
08 February, 2021·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the private respondents. After some arguments counsel for the petitioners confined his prayer only to the effect thatCivil Judge (J.D.)/Gramin, Nyayalaya, Behat, Saharanpur be directed to de...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Krit vs Civil Judge (Senior Division) ...
Judges: Prakash Padia
08 February, 2021·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the private respondents. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to Civil Judge (S.D.), Ghazipur, to decide 6-C application filed in Suit No.27 of 2020 (Ram Krit Vs. Smt. Japhiya ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahul And 6 Others vs Civil Judge(Junior Division) And ...
Judges: Saral Srivastava
08 February, 2021·The petitioners have come up in the present petition with a sole prayer that a direction be issued to respondent no.1-Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hathras to decide the 7C Temporary Injunction Application filed by them in Original Suit No.281 of 2020 (Rahul and Others Vs. Smt. Urmila & Others), ex...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Banny Ahamad Raza vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: J J Munir
08 February, 2021·Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant and the second opposite party were partners and there was a civil dispute between them that have led to a motivated prosecution which is an abuse of process of Court to settle a business dispute. Mr. Deepak Mishra, learned A.G.A. opposed t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Smt. Poonam Devi
Judges: Vivek Kumar Birla
08 February, 2021·7. It is not in dispute that previously instituted suit is the Original Suit No. 107 of 2013 seeking relief of permanent injunction and subsequently instituted suit is the SCC suit No. 6 of 2017 filed by the respondent-landlord herein rent and eviction. 8. Order IV-A inserted in State of UP vide UP ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Roj Ali & Others vs State Of U.P. & Another
Judges: Narendra Kumar Johari
08 February, 2021·From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case, at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sushma Saroj vs Shailesh Kumar And 3 Others
Judges: Vivek Varma
08 February, 2021·The sole relief pressed by learned counsel for the applicant is for directing the Court below to decide the Case No. 279 of 2015 (Sushma Devi Vs. Shailesh), under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, pending before the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alma And 2 Others vs State Of U.P And Another
Judges: J J Munir
08 February, 2021·Heard Mr. Sadaful Islam Jafri learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Anita Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party No.2, and Mr. S.S. Tiwari, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State. A perusal of the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., shows that the applicants' also have ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.