Sanjay Kumar Pandey vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Prakash Padia
24 December, 2021·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondent no.2. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the following prayer:- "(a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Rai vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
24 December, 2021·Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the following prayer:- "a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondent no.5 to take appropriate measures for extending tenure of service in Jagatpur ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dharmendra Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
24 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18482 of 2021 Petitioner :- Dharmendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shive Datta Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinay Pratap Singh vs State Of Up And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
24 December, 2021·Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Dixit Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. By means of the impugned order the respondents propose to recover dues representing alleged excess monetary benefits released in favour of the petitioner upon...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Laxmi Raj Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
24 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. By means of the impugned order the respondents propose to recover dues representing alleged excess monetary benefits released in favour of the petitioner upon being extended Assured Career Progression benefits. The order is assailed on the ground that no opportunity of heari...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U P And Another
Judges: Prakash Padia
24 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.1 whereas Sri A. K. S. Parihar, learned Counsel for the respondent no.2. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the prayer to dir...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Mohan Nigam vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Surya Prakash Kesarwani
24 December, 2021·On 28.09.2021, this court passed the following order: "Learned Standing Counsel shall obtain instructions from the second and third respondents in light of the submission addressed on behalf of the petitioner that in view of the directions issued by the Division Bench in Special Appeal Defective No....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Haji Mohammad Safi vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation And Others
Judges: Dinesh Pathak
24 December, 2021·Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. Present writ petition has been filed beseeching expeditious disposal of Revision No. 590 of 2021 (Haji Mohammad Safi vs. Meer Safayat and others), under Section 48(1) of U.P. C.H. Act, p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Iqbal Ahmad Alias Raju vs M/D Purvanchal Electricity And Others
Judges: S Sunita Agarwal
24 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26126 of 2021 Petitioner :- Iqbal Ahmad Alias Raju Respondent :- M/D Purvanchal Electricity And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Udit Chandra Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. From the affidavit of comp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Adalat vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Dinesh Pathak
24 December, 2021·Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. Present writ petition has been filed beseeching expeditious disposal of Appeal No. 1154/1275 of 2017 (Suresh and others vs. Gopi and others), under Section 11(i) of U.P. C.H. Act, pendin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.