Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sanjay Kumar Pandey vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18878 of 2021 Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Naveen Kumar Tripathi,Rishabh Pratap Singh Kachhawah Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.S.Parihar
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the following prayer:-
"(a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent No.2 to revalue the question No.96 and 98 of question Booklet Series A of Hindi subject of Post Graduate Examination (PGT) of Advertisement No.2 of 2021 of the petitioner bearing Roll Number 1011021746 and declare the result of petitioner as successful under General Category (EWS) candidate.
(b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent No. 2 to reserve one seat of Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) of Hindi subject of the petitioner under General category (EWS) candidate of Advertisement No.2 of 2021 bearing Roll Number 1011021746.
(c) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandmus commanding and directing the Respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation of petitioner dated 20.11.2021 in accordance with law within a stipulated period."
It is argued by Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondent No.2 that for the relief as sought in the present petition, the petitioner has already submitted a representation on 20.11.2021 before the respondent No.2/Secretary, U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board, Prayagraj, copy of which is appended as Annexure No.12 to the writ petition. It is further argued that the respondent no.2 will decide the aforesaid representation expeditiously.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection if the aforesaid representation has been decided within a time bound period.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In view of the undertaking given by Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondent No.2, this petition is disposed of directing the respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks from today.
Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondents is directed to communicate regarding this order to respondent No.2/Secretary, U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board, Prayagraj. The information given by him to respondent no.2 shall also deem to be sufficient in the matter.
Order Date :- 24.12.2021 Pramod Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sanjay Kumar Pandey vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 December, 2021
Judges
  • Prakash Padia
Advocates
  • Naveen Kumar Tripathi Rishabh Pratap Singh Kachhawah