Baburam vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Rajeev Singh
27 April, 2021·The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Baburam with the following prayer:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the resolution dated 12.02.2021 issued by the opposite party Nos.2 to 4 contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition. Iss...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagauti Prasad Pandey vs State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Saurabh Lavania
27 April, 2021·Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that justice would suffice if the competent Authority is directed to consider and decide the issue of payment of post retiral dues of the petitioner within the stipulated time as prescribed by this Court. It is further stated that the petitioner has alrea...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satish Kumar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Saurabh Lavania
27 April, 2021·The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is a license holder of a fair price shop and without getting a proper inquiry done, the license of the petitioner was cancelled and being aggrieved against the same, the petitioner has preferred the aforesaid appeal which is pending bef...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Quddus vs State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Saurabh Lavania
27 April, 2021·We have heard Shri H.R. Mishra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Krishna Mohan Misra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Shri Bipin Bihari Pandey, learned Chief Standing Counsel assisted by Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, Shri Indrasen Singh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Pathak vs State Of U.P. Thru. S.P., Cbi/Scb, ...
Judges: Narendra Kumar Johari
27 April, 2021·From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case, at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submissions made relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Jainab And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pritinker Diwaker
19 April, 2021·Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13461 of 2019 Petitioner :- Smt. Jainab And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Pawan Singh Pundir Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. Sri Atul Kumar, learned...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Devendra vs State Of U P
Judges: Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
19 April, 2021·3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that initially N.C.R. was lodged on 30.09.2020 by the complainant-Shiv Ram alleging that on 30.09.2020 at about 11:00 a.m. when he was tying his buffalo outside his house, all the accused persons who are the neighbors started abusing and assaulted him and...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sandeep Pal And 62 Others vs State Election Commission U.P. ...
Judges: Surya Prakash Kesarwani, Syed Aftab Rizvi
19 April, 2021·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to include the name of the petitioners in the Panchayat Election Electoral Roll, 2021 of village Amari, Block Bramhpur, D...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhartiya Rashtriya Rajmarg ... vs Smt. Manju Dixit And Another
Judges: Saral Srivastava
19 April, 2021·(ii) it is in contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law; or (iii) it is in conflict with the most basic notions of morality or justice.] Explanation 2.--For the avoidance of doubt, the test as to whether there is a contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law shall not entai...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhartiya Rashtriya Rajmarg ... vs Manoj Kumar Dixit And Another
Judges: Saral Srivastava
19 April, 2021·2. The appellant-Bhartiya Rashtriya Rajmarg Pradhikaran being aggrieved by the order dated 06.08.2020 passed by the District Judge, Shahjahanpur in Arbitration Case No.11 of 2016, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has preferred the present appeal under Section 37 of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.