Avinash And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
29 November, 2019·Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 31111 of 2018 Petitioner :- Avinash And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Shahi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared to press...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Desh Raj Singh vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
29 November, 2019·Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J. None present in the revised list from the side of revisionist, whereas, learned AGA is present for the State. Heard learned AGA for the State and perused the record. This revision has been listed on 04.03.2002 and since then the revision is awaiting for admission....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijai Pal Singh vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
29 November, 2019·None present in the revised list, whereas learned AGA is present for the State. Heard learned AGA for the State. This revision has been filed against the judgement and order dated 11.01.2002 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No. 12, Aligarh, in S.T. No. 412 of 1999, under sec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chunni Lal vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
29 November, 2019·Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2488 of 2005 Revisionist :- Chunni Lal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- S.C. Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,R.P.Tripathi Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J. None present even in the revised list on behalf of r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
29 November, 2019·Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5453 of 2009 Revisionist :- Raj Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- S.K. Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J. None is present even in the revised list. Learned A.G.A is present....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Teeka And Others vs State Of U P
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
29 November, 2019·Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J. None is present in the revised list, whereas learned AGA is present for the State. Heard learned AGA for the State. This revision has been filed by the revisionists Teeka, Laddu, Gyasi and Bhanwari against the judgement and order dated 20.02.2002 passed by the Spe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd Arif vs State Of U P And Anr
Judges: Karunesh Singh Pawar
29 November, 2019·Learned counsel for revisionist submits that revisionist is not named in the F.I.R. The revisionist has no criminal history. He further submits that there is no specific role assigned to the present revisionist. The revisionist has been declared juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board vide order date...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tarannum @ Tanya And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
29 November, 2019·Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22615 of 2018 Petitioner :- Tarannum @ Tanya And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Shantam Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared to ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bablu @ Babli And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
29 November, 2019·Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 28930 of 2018 Petitioner :- Bablu @ Babli And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Hira Lal Singh(Kushwaha) Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. 1. Called...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Saddam And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
29 November, 2019·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. 1. Heard Mohd. Washeem, learned counsel for petitioners and learned A.G.A. For respondents. 2. This writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing First Information Report dated 13.08...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.