Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Saddam And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 32248 of 2018 Petitioner :- Saddam And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Waseem Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
1. Heard Mohd. Washeem, learned counsel for petitioners and learned A.G.A. For respondents.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing First Information Report dated 13.08.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 1089 of 2018 under Sections 323, 354, 377, 498-A and 506 IPC and Section ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Baradari, District Bareilly.
3. From a perusal of first information report and taking the allegations contained therein to be true, it cannot be said that commission of a cognizable offence is not made out. Despite repeated query, learned counsel for petitioners also could not show that no offence whatsoever has been made out in the aforesaid first information report. Therefore, question of its quashing in the limited scope of judicial review in writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution does not arise.
4. In view thereof, relief sought by petitioners for quashing of impugned first information report cannot be granted.
5. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 29.11.2019 Ashish Pd.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Saddam And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Mohammad Waseem