Ram Narayan vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 November, 2019·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the impugned suspension order dated 12.07.2019 passed by third respondent. The petitioner has been suspended on the ground of unauthorised a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Manoj Kumar Bharti vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 November, 2019·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner, presently working as Junior Clerk, is before this Court assailing the order dated 28.6.2019 passed by second respondent by which he has been transferred from Malikhan Singh Distr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amit Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
28 November, 2019·1. Heard Mr. Radha Kant Ojha, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Satyendra Chandra Tripathi, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing respondents 1, 2 & 3 and Mr. Markandey Upadhyay, learned counsel representing respondent-5. 2. Vires of Section 21-G of U.P. Second...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyam Babu Dwivedi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
28 November, 2019·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 61088 of 2010 Petitioner :- Shyam Babu Dwivedi Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shrawan Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C. S. C. Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Roop Chandra vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 November, 2019·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18996 of 2019 Petitioner :- Roop Chandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akanksha Mishra,Kshitij Shailendra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjai Singh Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Preeti Kumari vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 November, 2019·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the withdrawal application. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to respondents to pay the salary to the petitioner fro...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anarpati Verma And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 November, 2019·Petitioners are before this Court with the prayer to command the respondents to consider the claim of petitioners for promotion on vacant post of Additional Director of Education from retrospective date when the juniors to the petitioners were promoted, with all consequential benefits withou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prem Chandra vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 November, 2019·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19042 of 2019 Petitioner :- Prem Chandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gulab Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Union Of India Thru Divisional Railway Manager And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
28 November, 2019·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 44207 of 2012 Petitioner :- The Union Of India Thru Divisional Railway Manager And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.K. Gaur,Vivek Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. 1. Called in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Vivek Varma
28 November, 2019·Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter. This writ petition is of the year 2006. From perusal of the record, it appears that the present writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismis...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.