Lachchhi Ram vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
25 February, 2019·Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. The grievance of the petitioner is that while the record operation was going on under section 43 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the records were still, therefore, unsettled, the land which were, before the record operation commenced, given out on leases could not be s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Subedar vs Dheerendra And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
25 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6522 of 2019 Petitioner :- Subedar Respondent :- Dheerendra And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nandan Singh Yaduvanshi,Ajay Singh Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. The sole prayer of the petitioner is that the Mutation Case No.T-20171436580110 (Subedar Vs. Dheerendra & Ors.) und...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Aarif vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
25 February, 2019·The petitioner has drawn our attention towards the regulations framed by the State of U.P. in exercise of powers under clause(a) of Section 51-A of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The said rules are known as Uttar Pradesh Establishment and Regulation of Saw Mills (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 2017...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Navi Jaan And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
25 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6523 of 2019 Petitioner :- Navi Jaan And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Piyush Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. After some length of the arguments, learne...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Akanksha Bhatt And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
25 February, 2019·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Mukesh Kumar Pandey, learned State Law Officer for the State respondents. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jooli And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
25 February, 2019·By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and have solemnized their ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sandhya And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
25 February, 2019·By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and have solemnized their marriage ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramchandra Yadav And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal
25 February, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. On the matter being taken up today, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of this writ petition. Prayer made is allowed. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Order Date :- 25.2...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Priti Devi And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
25 February, 2019·Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and have solemnized their marriage with each other according to Hindu Rites and Custom on 19.2.2019. They have also applied online for registration of their marriage on 20.2.2019. No F.I.R. has been registered against...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dayanand Sharma vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
25 February, 2019·3. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing recovery citation dated 22.3.2019 for Rs.5,70,400/- plus other charges. 4. The petitioner had taken a loan of Rs.1,60,000/- for agricultural purpose. It is admitted to the petitioner that a default has been committed by the pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.