Devendra Pratap Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Manoj Misra
26 October, 2018·Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Mahboob Ali,J. Heard counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel for the respondent no. 1 to 5 and 10. The writ petition has been filed with various prayers. The first prayer is to direct the respondents to make entry of the name of acquiring body (PWD) in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nisha And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
26 October, 2018·Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Ms. Sajiya Parveen, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent no.4, it is taken on record. It is informed by the learned Standing Counsel that first information report has been registered against the petitioner no.2. In view of the said fact, learned coun...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Layak Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
26 October, 2018·Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. The petitioner is a fair price shop dealer of New Yadav Colony, Nagar Kshetra Shikohabad, District Firozabad. The license of the petitioner has been suspended by District Suppl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Aruna Devi And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
26 October, 2018·The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents not to interfere in their married life and also for protection of their lives and liberty. The petitioners claim that they are adults and living together out of their own freewill. It is stated that for the said r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Salman And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
26 October, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35614 of 2018 Petitioner :- Salman And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that certain documents could not be fi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fazal Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ashok Kumar
26 October, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of. The allegation of the petitioner is that the respondent nos.4, 5 and 6 have illegally encroached the public...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohan Singh vs Uttar Pradesh Rajya Sarak Parivahan Nigam And Another
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
26 October, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35663 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mohan Singh Respondent :- Uttar Pradesh Rajya Sarak Parivahan Nigam And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Lokesh Kumar Dwivedi,Lavkush Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Adarsh Bhushan Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard Shri Lavkush Kumar ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Sangam Builders Suddhipur Shivpur vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
26 October, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the impugned ex- parte order dated 31.3.2017 and recovery certificate dated 13.9.2017 passed by the third respondent assessing the amount of Cess Rs. 4,01,706/- taking the value of the construction under the Act to the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Devendra Kumar Shukla vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
26 October, 2018·Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. Hon'ble Ved Prakash Vaish,J. From the record, it appears that the petitioner was granted a contract for constructing a road from the Maharajganj to Chawk under Pradhan Mantri Gramin Sadak Yozana. In this regard, a contract was executed on 22.4.2013. It is stated...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sualehen And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
26 October, 2018·The petitioners claim that they are adults and living together out of their own freewill. It is stated that for the said reason, the fourth respondent and his other family members have got annoyed and there is serious danger to the lives of the petitioners as they are being threatened and harassed. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.