Smt Preeti Upadhyay vs State Of U P & Others
Judges: Siddharth
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Heard Shri J.P. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The copy of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is not on record. Duly attested copy of the counter affidavit filed by the learned Standing Counsel is...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwan Sahai Sharma vs Additional District Judge/ Motor Accident Claim Tribunal Court No Aligarh And Another
Judges: Ram Surat Ram
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. The counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the prayer clause in the writ petition. Heard Sri Ashvni Mishra, for the petitioner and Sri Anadi Krishna Narayan for the respondents. The writ petition has been filed against the order of Motor Accident Claim T...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Santoshi Shelesh Beldar And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
28 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Munna Lal Pal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11174 of 2018 Petitioner :- Munna Lal Pal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shamimul Hasnain,Indu Bhushan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri Shamimul Hasnain for the petitioner and Standing Cou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sardar Singh And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the petitioners, Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri R.B. Sahai, counsel for the respondent-bank. Counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from them. Admittedly, the petitioners took loan from...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Savita Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: S Sangeeta Chandra
28 March, 2018·(Oral) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner making the following prayers:- i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned resolution dated 10.11.17 passed by the respondent No. 3. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dilavar Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
28 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11148 of 2018 Petitioner :- Dilavar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avadhesh Singh,Rajesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. After the matter was heard at length, Sri Awadhesh Sin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tilak Nath Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: S Sangeeta Chandra
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. (Oral) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the suspension order dated 27.02.2018 passed by the respondent No. 2, District Supply Officer, Mau. 2. On perusal of the order dated 27.02.2018 it is evident that the District ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Renu Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: S Sangeeta Chandra
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted liberty to correct the array of parties in the writ petition and strike out District Supply Officer as respondent no. 3 and replace the said respondent by SDM, Sadar Deoria during the course of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Gupta vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
28 March, 2018·Heard Sri Subedar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel. This writ petition is preferred for seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no.2 / Commissioner, Azamgarh Mandal, Azamgarh to decide Appeal no. 245/B ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.