Manik Chand vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the array of parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer for a direction to second respondent i.e. District In...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hare Ram vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri Shashi Kant for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Kumar Patel, holding brief of Sri Adarsh Bhushan for U.P. Purvanchal Power Corporation Ltd. This writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing the Executive Engineer (repsondent-7) to pay permanent pension ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pramod Yadav vs State Of Up And Others
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. This petition is directed against an order dated 23.1.2018, whereby an Inquiry Committee has been constituted on the ground that petitioner has not submitted any reply to the charges framed against him. The order is challenged on the ground that the same is impermissi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwan Das vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 March, 2018·Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijendra Deo Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amit Shukla Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard Shri B.D. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vivek Kumar Srivastava vs Syed Suhail Akhtar
Judges: Surya Prakash Kesarwani
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Heard learned counsel for defendant-tenant/ petitioner. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief: "(i) To issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the record and quashing the impugned order dated 22...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Sudama Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In pith and substance, the petitioner is asking that his representation dated 01.12.2017 addressed to the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Mirzapur, with regard to consideration of her case for selection grade pay, may be decided exped...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Radhey Shyam Tyagi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri Surya Prakash Singh for the petitioner and Sri Adarsh Bhushan for respondents-2 and 3. The writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing respodnent-2 to consider the case of the petitioner relating to fixation of pay scale. The petitioner is alleging...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rashid Miyan vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri Rafat Raza Khan counsel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner claims to be working as Tractor Driver on contract basis with the Nagar Palika Parishad, Milak, distt. Rampur It is his case that at present, there is no sanction...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Narayan vs State Of Up And Others
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
28 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8756 of 2018 Petitioner :- Shiv Narayan Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. After some arguments in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner comes up with a prayer ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramesh Chandra vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Hreard Sri Ram Shiromani Yadav for the petitioner, Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. and Sri Anadi Krishna Narayan, for respodnents-2 and 3. The writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner on the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.