Raj Kumar And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Heard Sri K.S. Tiwari, counsel for the petitioners, Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Rohit Yadav, counsel for the respondent-bank. Counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from them. Admittedly, the petitioners took loan from the respo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madhuri Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: S Sangeeta Chandra
28 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11140 of 2018 Petitioner :- Madhuri Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with a limited prayer for a direction to the App...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hariom vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Heard counsel for the petitioner, Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Ravi Prakash Pandey for the respondent- bank. The counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from him. Admittedly, the petitioner took loan from the respondent-Bank concer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Siya Ram vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Heard Sri Pradyumn Kumar, counsel for the petitioner, Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Manoj Nigam, counsel for the respondent-bank. Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from the petitioner. Admittedly, the petitioner took loan from...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shankarshaneshwardhar Dubey vs District Magistrate
Judges: S Sangeeta Chandra
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. (Oral) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Diwakar Singh, Advocate, for respondent No. 4 and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a Mandamus to be issued to the District ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sabir Ali And Another vs The Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram
28 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11367 of 2018 Petitioner :- Sabir Ali And Another Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Adya Prasad Tewari,Sheo Shankar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard counsel for the petitioner and Standing Co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Bhawana Saini And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
28 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chhote Lal Bharti And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri K.M. Asthana counsel for the respondent-bank. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from him. Admittedly, the petitioner took loan from the re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shriyut Sri Vijay Rai vs The Of U P And Another
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Heard counsel for the petitioner, Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Gyan Prakash Srivastava for the respondent-bank. The counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from him. Admittedly, the petitioner took loan from the respondent-Bank con...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahendra Yadav vs The Of U P And Another
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Heard counsel for the petitioner, Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Gyan Prakash Srivastava for the respondent-bank. The counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from him. Admittedly, the petitioner took loan from the respondent-Bank con...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.