Diensh Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U P & Others
Judges: Siddharth
28 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 49074 of 2000 Petitioner :- Diensh Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- V.B.L. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Despite issuance of notice to engage another counsel since the counsel for the petitioner ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Matloob Khan vs District Inspector Of School & Others
Judges: Siddharth
28 March, 2018·Brief facts of the petition are that a short term vacancy on the post of Assistant Teacher, L.T. Grade arose in Kisan Inter College, Mirjamurad, Varanasi, an aided and recognized institution. The vacancy occurred on account of adhoc promotion of Shri Shiv Raj Mishra on the post of lecturer in ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Chand vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: S Sangeeta Chandra
28 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11145 of 2018 Petitioner :- Lal Chand Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with a limited prayer to issue a direction to ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganga Charan vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Giri, counsel for the petitioner, Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Pankaj Srivastava, holding brief of Sri Satish Chaturvedi, counsel for the respondent-bank. Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from the pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indra Dev vs Commissioner Basti And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
28 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11149 of 2018 Petitioner :- Indra Dev Respondent :- Commissioner Basti And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deendayal Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. No good ground is made out to issue mandamus for expedi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Mahindra And Mahindra Financial Services Ltd vs The Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram
28 March, 2018·Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devendra Vikram Singh,Durgesh Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri S.P. Gautam for the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the recovery certificate date...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Gosiya And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
28 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yashvir Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Heard Sri Ranjeet Kumar Yadav, counsel for the petitioners, Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Krishna Mohan Asthana, counsel for the respondent-bank. Counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from them. Admittedly, the petitioners took l...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Sarita And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
28 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prempal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: S Sangeeta Chandra
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 18.9.2017 passed by the Deputy Commissioner (Food), Bareilly Division, Bareilly rejecting the stay application of the petitioner in Appeal No. 96 of 2017 (Prempal Vs. State of U.P.). I ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.