Suman Sonu Omprakash And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Judges: Surya Prakash Kesarwani
30 June, 2016·"eSa lksuw iq=h Lo0 vkse izdk'k vEcsMdj] fuoklh&iwoZ gfjdj ys ykmV] fppdjk] lqesj okMZ ua0&9] rglhy&lkousUnz] ftyk&ukxiqj ¼egkjk"Vª½ dh gwWA eSa l'kiFk fuEufyf[kr c;ku djrh gwW fd esjs firk vkse izdk'k vEcsMj dk LoxZokl lu~ 1994 esa gks x;k FkkA eq>s ;g ugha ekywe esjs firk th dks bl ;kfpdk esa izfr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Shlok Pandey Thru His Friend ... vs Union Of India Thru Secy.Govt.Of ...
Judges: Sudhir Kumar Saxena, Pramod Kumar Srivastava
30 June, 2016·2. The facts giving rise to present petition are that on 22.10.2014 at about 7:00 pm in the evening Vinod Kumar Yadav, Rajiv Yadav, Sunil Kumar Yadav, Shailendra Kumar, Ram Bahadur and Dhirendra Kumar Yadav were coming by three motor-cycles from gram Dafra at about 8:00 pm in the evening. They reach...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Birendra Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy., ...
Judges: Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, Raghvendra Kumar
30 June, 2016·Before parting, we may also observe that here is a case where the petitioner, admittedly, is a candidate for recruitment and appointment in U.P. Higher Judicial Service. Once appointed, he will be a member of the cadre of Higher Judicial Service where he will have to discharge judicial functions, wh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh (Jail Appeal ) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Sudhir Kumar Saxena, Pramod Kumar Srivastava
30 June, 2016·"15. Sine qua non for application of Section 3(2)(v) is that an offence must have been committed against a person on the ground that such person is a member of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. In the instant case no evidence has been led to establish this requirement. It is not case of the pro...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chiranjeev Kumar Arya vs State Of U.P. & Another
Judges: Sudhir Kumar Saxena
29 June, 2016·11. Sections 397 and section 401 Cr.P.C. prescribe revisional powers of High Court. Section 397 Cr.P.C. contemplates that revisional power can be exercised by the High Court not only on the application of aggrieved person but also suo moto. 12. Section 4 (2) of Cr.P.C. provides that all offences und...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Rakhi Raghav And 3 Ors. vs State Of U.P. And 4 Ors.
Judges: Ram Surat Maurya
28 June, 2016·The respondents are granted one month time to file counter affidavit. The petitioners will have three weeks thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit. List thereafter. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners were appointed with the approval of Basic Siksha Adhikari. Now one Member of Commit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jitendra Kumar Lavaniya vs High Court Of Judicature At ...
Judges: Ram Surat Maurya
28 June, 2016·Standing Counsel of High Court of Judicature at Allahabad is granted one month time to file counter affidavit. List in week commencing 8th August, 2016 before appropriate Bench. Order Date :- 28.6.2016 Rahul /-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Udai Shanker Mishra vs Om Prakash Shukla
Judges: Sudhir Kumar Saxena
28 June, 2016·14. Case of Rangappa v. Sri Mohan, (2010) 11 SCC, 441, para 18 pertains to a case where payment was stopped by drawer. In para 18, it was observed that when a cheque is dishonoured on account of "stop-payment" instructions sent by the accused to his bank in respect of a post-dated cheque, irrespecti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay @ Rakesh Rathour vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: Aditya Nath Mittal
28 June, 2016·Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that only four cases have been shown in the Gang Chart in which he has already been released on bail. It has also been submitted that the applicant is not involved in any antisocial activities and he has been falsely implicated. Learned AGA has opposed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajendra Prasad Tiwari (Durwan) vs Union Of India Thru' Secry., ...
Judges: Ram Surat Maurya
28 June, 2016·Notice on behalf of respondents has been accepted by Sri Sudhanshu Srivastava. He is granted one month time to file counter affidavit. When the case is listed next name of Sri Sudhanshu Srivastava and Sri G.P. Singh be also shown as counsel for the respondents. Order Date :- 28.6.2016 Rahul /-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.