Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2016
  6. /
  7. January

Sanjay @ Rakesh Rathour vs State Of Uttar Pradesh

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 June, 2016

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
The accused-applicant is involved in Case Crime No. 305 of 2015 under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Laharpur, District Sitapur.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that only four cases have been shown in the Gang Chart in which he has already been released on bail. It has also been submitted that the applicant is not involved in any antisocial activities and he has been falsely implicated.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on merits, let the applicant Sanjay @ Rakesh Rathour be released on bail in 305 of 2015 under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Laharpur, District Sitapur on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
2. The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
3. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
4. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 28.6.2016 VNP/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sanjay @ Rakesh Rathour vs State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 June, 2016
Judges
  • Aditya Nath Mittal