Dr. Nagendra Ram vs State Of U.P. And 3 Ors
Judges: Sheo Kumar Singh, Dinesh Maheshwari
09 September, 2014·Although it has not been stated that respondent is junior to the petitioner but the claim is that administrative and financial power is to be exercised by the petitioner . We fail to understand the reason for the argument but at the same time in the impugned order nothing is mentioned. We permit lea...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sachchidanand Chaubey vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Ramesh Sinha
09 September, 2014·It is stated by the counsel for the applicant that the complainant Narendri Giri has filed an affidavit before the SSP, Gautam Budh Nagar denying about the incident and participation of the applicant. A copy of the affidavit dated 16.7.2014 has been annexed as Annexure-2 at page 15-19 of the bail ap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fareed Ahmad @ Mainu vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Ramesh Sinha
09 September, 2014·Sri N.I. Jafri, learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file supplementary affidavit. Connect present bail application with bail application No. 8640 of 2014 and list accordingly. Order Date :- 9.9.2014 SKS...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Nirmala Devi vs Smt. Neelam Devi
Judges: Rajiv Sharma, Mahendra Dayal
09 September, 2014·From the perusal of the record we find that the appellant applied for compensation under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 with the allegation that her husband late Ram Shankar Gupta was driver of Truck No. U.P. 42 B- 2294 and on 8.5.2007 some unknown persons in order to commit loot, killed him. Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gramin Machhua Samuday Samiti ... vs State Of U.P. & 2 Others
Judges: Ran Vijai Singh
09 September, 2014·The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 20.6.2014 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Dhanghata, district Sant Kabir Nagar on the representation of the petitioner pursuant to the order of this Court dated 16.4.2014 passed in Writ C No. 19931 of 2014 (Gramin Machhua Samuday Samiti Deeppur Sa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abu Saima vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Ramesh Sinha
09 September, 2014·Counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant is in Jail since 5.8.2014 but he has not mentioned the same in the bail application. He has filed supplementary affidavit. List after two weeks by which date he shall file a supplementary affidavit stating about the period of the detention of t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hotel Arti Delux (Pvt.) Ltd. vs Asst. Commissiner Of Income Tax, ...
Judges: Tarun Agarwala, Satish Chandra
09 September, 2014·"(i) Whether, the income of Rs.3,23,000/- is income from business and profession and not income from house property? (ii) Whether, the learned Tribunal has totally misread and misinterpreted the lease agreement between the appellant and M/s Deva Nursing Home (P) Ltd. to hold that the receipts derive...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Ambe Carrier & Another vs State Of U.P. & 3 Others
Judges: Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud, Chief Justice, Dilip Gupta
09 September, 2014·Similarly, in the more recent decision in Super Fast Transport (supra) also, an order of blacklisting had been passed which was challenged on the ground that it was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. This is evident from the order of the Court dated 22 October 2013 which reads...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Ratnawali Mishra ... vs Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gonda And ...
Judges: Rajiv Sharma, Mahendra Dayal
09 September, 2014·This special appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 19.9.2012 passed in Writ Petition No. 2058(SS) of 2009, whereby learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition inter alia on the grounds that the impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or impropriety and call for no interfe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. A.K. Gupta & 2 Others vs Nagar Nigam, Allahabad Thru' ...
Judges: Tarun Agarwala, Satish Chandra
09 September, 2014·The petitioners have received a notice dated 06.02.2006 under Section 209 of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporations Adhiniyam, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam) indicating that it is proposed to assess the annual value of the property at Rs. 88,35,606/- and property tax at Rs. 6,18,5...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.