Ram Prasad Singh Advocate And ... vs Shri Ganga Prasad And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
04 September, 2012·The above two orders in connection with issue No.6 have been impugned in the present writ petition. The submission of Sri Gulrez Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners is that in view of the special remedy provided under Section 16-A(7) of the Act for resolving the dispute of the Committee of Man...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Chandra Metal Company ... vs Sri Avtar Singh And Ors.
Judges: Saeed Uz Zaman Siddiqi
04 September, 2012·I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and have gone through the records as well as the judgments and orders impugned in the present writ petition. The legal position is that when any tenancy is reported or is brought to the knowledge of the Rent Control and Eviction Officer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajneesh Kumar & 2 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Through District ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba
04 September, 2012·Issue notice to respondent no.5, returnable in four weeks. Respondent nos.1 to 4 would be represented by Sri Pankaj Patel, learned Government Advocate. In the meantime, any action taken by respondent no.1 shall remain subject to decision of this writ petition. Order Date :- 4.9.2012 A.Nigam...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
N.K.Kejriwal And Another vs State Of U.P. & Another
Judges: Ramesh Sinha
04 September, 2012·It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the sole basis of the complaint is that the applicants have not obtained prior permission/approval by the competent authority as required under Section 25 M of the Central Act read with Section 25 M read with Rule 75 B(1) (2) (3) of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Roop Kishore Gautam vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba
04 September, 2012·3.It has been asserted by learned counsel for the petitioner that memo Annexure-16 dated 09.8.2012 was given to the petitioner on 14.8.2012, which fact can be verified from the record of respondents. So far as fabrication of memo of Annexure-16 is concerned, learned counsel has pointed out that memo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Rafeeq & 3 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba
03 September, 2012·Sri Ausaf Ahmad Khan, Advocate, has put in appearance for respondent nos.2 and 3 and states that there were certain serious complaints against the petitioners on account of which payment of salary of the petitioners was stopped. Learned counsel contends that in case relevant notice has not been give...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Praveen Chanchal vs State Of U.P. & Others
Judges: V K Shukla
03 September, 2012·(a) Language - This group consists of the subjects of Hindi, Sanskrit, Urdu, Persian and Arabic; (b) Science - This group consists of the subjects of Science and Mathematics; (c) Art and Craft (d) Music (e) Agriculture (f) Home Science (g) Physical Education (g) General This group consist of the sub...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Meena Saxena vs State Of U.P. Through Secy. Basic ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba
03 September, 2012·Issue notice to respondent no.2, returnable in two weeks. Sri Ajay Verma, Advocate has put in appearance for respondent no.3 and Respondent no.1 would be represented by the Government Counsel. Because the order of transfer was actuated in July, 2012, there would be no stay on operation of impugned o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyam Mahavidyalaya And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others
Judges: Amreshwar Pratap Sahi
03 September, 2012·The said order which is impugned herein strangely enough refers to a decision taken on 24th March, 2012 for imposing this penalty when according to the same document the examinations were held later on i.e. on 27.4.2012. It is not understandable as to how the decision could have been taken on 24th M...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Siddhnath Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Secy. Nagar ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba
03 September, 2012·Sri Shashi Kant Mishra, Advocate, has put in appearance for respondent nos.4 and 5. State counsel would appear for respondent nos.1 to 3. Let counter affidavit be filed within two weeks from today indicating the period within which retiral dues, if payable, would be released. List after four weeks. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.