Bhairav Prasad Pathak vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba
07 September, 2012·The main contention on behalf of the petitioner is that the respondent no.6 is not eligible to be appointed as Principal, if a reference is made to Rule 5 of U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission Rules, 1983, read with Regulations made under the Intermediate Education Act, 1921. Sri Parihar, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Subodh Kumar vs Presiding Officer Labour ...
Judges: Sunita Agarwal
07 September, 2012·He further submits that the employers have failed to discharge the burden laid upon them that they have not indulged in unfair labour practice. On burden of proof, learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon judgments in Amar Chakravary & others vs. Maruti Suzuki India Limited reported in (2010) ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Siya Dulari vs Additional Commissioner, ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
07 September, 2012·At the outset, Sri J. P. Mathur, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.5 has categorically submitted that he does not have any objection so far as the application for recall of the order dated 06.07.2012 is concerned. However, he stated that since after execution of sale deed on 3.11.1998 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Aditya Prakash Rastogi vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: Rajiv Sharma, Surendra Vikram Rathore
06 September, 2012·Case called out. Neither learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor any request for adjournment of the case or any passing over slip has been sent. Learned Standing Counsel present for the State of U.P. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vaca...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Bahadur Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Secy. Basic ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba
06 September, 2012·Issue notice to opposite party no.5, returnable in four weeks. Opposite party nos.3 and 4 are represented by Sri Neeraj Chaurasiya, Advocate. Opposite party nos.1 and 2 shall be represented by Learned Government Advocate. Order Date :- 6.9.2012 A.Nigam...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Chandra Sharma vs C/M Vidya Bal Mandali And Others
Judges: Amreshwar Pratap Sahi
06 September, 2012·Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that while making the inquiry the Assistant Registrar Firms Societies & Chits Railway Road, Saharanpur has no jurisdiction to stop the operation of the bank accounts. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners has substance. Learned Standi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Satnam Kaur [U/A 227] vs State Of U.P. Thru Secretary (Law) ...
Judges: Saeed Uz Zaman Siddiqi
06 September, 2012·The petitioner has sought for issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding learned IIIrd Additional District Judge, Lakhimpur Kheri to decide misc. case no.167 of 2009 (Smt. Satnam Kaur v. Satendra Pal Singh and others), which is pending for the last more than three years for grant of probate. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Madhuri vs U.P. State Sugar Corporation ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba
06 September, 2012·3.This court has taken note of the fact that order dated 21.1.2012 was not challenged. The petitioner did not even withdraw her application under V.R.S. filed on 29.12.2011. 4.Vide order dated 08.8.2012, Annexure-1, application of the petitioner under V.R.S. has been allowed. 5.Learned counsel for t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kiran Pal Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru. P.S. Basic ...
Judges: V K Shukla
06 September, 2012·The writ petition is directed to be listed in the next cause list before appropriate Bench. Order Date :- 6.9.2012 SRY Court No. - 30 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19284 of 2010 Petitioner :- Kiran Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. P.S. Basic Education & Ors. Petitioner Counsel :- Manish Yadav Re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Shubham Traders vs Commissioner Of Commercial Tax
Judges: Bharati Sapru
06 September, 2012·(iv)Whether the tribunal was justified in holding the work contract of the applicant to be merely the contract of supply, though the cement is being provided free of cost by the contractee and hence the main object of the contract is not transfer of property but is of transfer of work and labour, wh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.