Ram Beer Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru Sec. Dept Of Rev. ...
Judges:
22 June, 2010·Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the said amount in easy instalments. Sri T.S. Rai, learned counsel for respondent no.4 has no objection if the amount is paid at the earliest. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with the co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhudeo Singh And Others vs State Of U.P. Through Secy. Home ...
Judges:
22 June, 2010·Issue notice to respondent no. 3. Each one of the respondents is accorded six weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within next two weeks. List thereafter. It has been contended on behalf of petitioners that entire family has been falsely roped in the present crimina...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Milan Tiwari, vs State Of U.P., Thru. Prin. Secy., ...
Judges:
22 June, 2010·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate. Under challenge in the instant writ petition is the FIR relating to Case Crime No.460 of 2010 under Sections 420, 255, 259, 272, 468, 467, 471, 472 I.P.C. and Copyright Sections, Police Station Shivratanganj, Di...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Aditya Prasad Agarwal vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges:
22 June, 2010·Admit. Let notice be issued to respondent no. 2 returnable within one month for filing counter affidavit, if any, till the date fixed. Let the application be put up for hearing on 11.08.2010. In the meanwhile, no coercive measure shall be adopted to ensure the personal appearance of the applicant/ac...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alok Kumar Pachori And Another vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges:
22 June, 2010·Learned A.G.A. has accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2. Issue notice to respondent no. 3. Each one of the respondents is accorded six eight weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within next two weeks. List thereafter. It has been sought to be contended...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Bank Of India vs Sri Surjeet Singh And Others
Judges:
22 June, 2010·Application of the bank for attachment of the property in question is pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The bank apprehends that respondent no.2 may transfer the property qua which attachment has been asked for, before the application is considered. The writ petition is misplaced as any tra...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Aslam Siddiqui, vs U.P. Power Corporation Ltd., ...
Judges:
22 June, 2010·Heard learned counsel for parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction for opposite parties not to disconnect the electricity connection of House No. 17/23-1, Picnic Spot Road, Indira Nagar, Lucknow. In the instant case, petitioner is a tenant...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Aarif S/O Late Mushtak Thru ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges:
22 June, 2010·Since these two Habeas Corpus petitions have been registered on the basis of telegrams raising the similar grievance, as such, they are being disposed of finally by this common order. In these Habeas Corpus Writ Petitions, it has been alleged by the sender of the telegrams i.e. Sarfaraj Zama Ansari ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Veena Agrawal vs State Of U.P. & Another
Judges:
22 June, 2010·Sri Pankaj Bharti, learned Advocate has put in his his appearance on behalf of respondent no.2 by filing vakalatnama. It is alleged that no offence is made out against the revisionist in view of the law laid down by this Court (reported in 2008 (63) ACC 463, Praveen Kumar Jain versus State of U.P an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.