Krishna Rice And Dal Mills And ... vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: B K Roy, L Bihari
18 August, 1999·2. Shri C. K. Parekh, learned counsel appearing in support of this writ petition with reference to a Division Bench decision of our own High Court in Shri Vijay Rice Mills Rudrapur v. State of U. P., 1998 (33) ALR 684, contended that this writ petition be disposed of in the same manner as it was don...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajay Pal Singh vs High Court Of Judicature At ...
Judges: M Katju, K Kumar
18 August, 1999·1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the part of the annual remark against the petitioner for the year 1995-96 as communicated by the High Court through his letter dated 27.3.97. Annexure-8 to the writ petition and for quashing the order dated 21.5.96, Annexure-5 to the writ petition. 2...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahabeer Prasad, Chukidar, ... vs District Basic Education Officer ...
Judges: S Harkauli
18 August, 1999·1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing for respondent No. 1. also. 2. By the impugned order dated 17-6-1999, the respondent No. 1 has refused the give approval to the promotion of the petitioner from class IV post to class III post. In clause No. 4 of the order dat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management, Shahid ... vs 1St Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: D Seth
18 August, 1999·2. Dr. R. G, Padia. learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the grant of injunction had virtually decreed the suit itself. Therefore, such an Interim injunction cannot be granted. He further contended that the application for Injunction was not supported by any affidavit, whereas Order XXXI...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Narain Singh, Advocate vs Special Judge, E.C. Act/Addl. ...
Judges: J Gupta
17 August, 1999·2. This is tenant's writ petition. 3. The dispute relates to a portion in the ground floor of the building known as 'Conniston', situated at Tallital. Nainltal. Petitioner is undisputedly a tenant in the same. Respondent No. 3, the landlady, in the year 1984 moved applications for the release of tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ranno Devi vs Board Of Revenue And Others
Judges: S Narain
17 August, 1999·4. It was decreed by the trial court and the Judgment was affirmed up to the High Court. 4. The defendant Nos. 2 to 4 also contested the suit. They denied the averments made in the plaint and also the averments made in the written statement filed by the petitioner. it was alleged that the plaintiffs...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Ashis And Another vs District Judge, Deoria And Others
Judges: D Seth
17 August, 1999·3. While challenging the same. Mr. R. S. Kushwaha, learned counsel for the petitioners contends that since the defendant No. 2 was present when the order of ad interim injunction was passed, therefore, the same could not be varied or vacated under Order XXXIX. Rule 4 in view of Second Proviso to the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Brahma Devi And Others vs Vth Addl. District Judge And ...
Judges: D K Seth
17 August, 1999·2. Mr. K. M. Misnra, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that by an order dated August 30, 1997, an application for substitution filed by Avinash Chandra Saxena in the place and stead of Prakash Chandra Saxena was dismissed. According to him, the order is revisable. But the opposite party ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganesh Shanker Pandey And Co. vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: S Narain
17 August, 1999·"A successful bidder shall be required to furnish a performance guarantee, in the form of a bank guarantee, equivalent to 5% of the bare construction cost, inclusive of interest charges and as indicated in the bid, and valid during the period of construction." "This performance guarantee, as left un...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Rekha Mehrotra vs Xiith Addl. District Judge, ...
Judges: S Narain
17 August, 1999·3. The application was opposed by the petitioner. She denied that there was any relationship of landlord and tenant between her and respondent No. 3. She stated that her husband was a tenant. It was further denied that respondent No. 3 requires the accommodation in question. He owns Flat No. G-99, S...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.