Machhua, Matsya Vikas Sahakari ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: K Agrawal, R Shukla
29 November, 1985·4. It appears that thereafter respondent No. 4 applied for granting of permit under Chapter VI' of the Minerals Rules. The petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 also applied for being granted the permits. The respondent No. 3 gave the mining permit under Chapter VI to respondent No. 4 in respect of sand, which g...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Sales Tax vs Allied Surgical Emporium ...
Judges: K Misra
28 November, 1985·Drug" has been defined under Clause (b) of Section 3 of the Act. It reads as under: 3. (b) 'Drug' includes-- (i) all medicines for internal or external use of human beings or animals and all substances intended to be used for or diagnosis or treatment, mitigation or prevention of any disease or diso...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Sales Tax vs Munna Lal Anil Kumar
Judges: K Misra
28 November, 1985·1. Heard learned standing counsel and perused the impugned order dated 23rd February, 1981. The sole question which was urged by the learned standing counsel is whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and the material available on record, the learned Member, Sales Tax Tribunal, was legall...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Heera Electrodes vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Judges: A Banerji, V Khanna
22 November, 1985·1. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Senior Standing Counsel for the Union of India representing the respondents we are of the opinion that this writ petition should be rejected on the ground that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy of appeal - where he can r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Heera Electrodes vs Superintendent Of Central Excise
Judges: A Benerji, G Khanna
22 November, 1985·ORDER 1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shishir Kumar, Additional Standing Counsel for the Union of India representing the respondent. For the view that Heera Electrodes, Rampur v. Union of India and Anr. (W.P. No. 818 of 1985) this writ petition must also fail. The prayer ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sushil Kumar Narendra Kumar vs Collector Of Central Excise And ...
Judges: A Banerji, O Prakash
21 November, 1985·1. The petitioner has, come before this court under Article 226 of the Constitution for the release of the seized truck and the goods contained therein which were seized by the Central excise authorities at the Octroi Check Post, Rajghat, Shastri Bridge, Allahabad on 6th Nov., 1985. The petitioner's...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Sales Tax vs Om Engineering Works
Judges: A Singh
20 November, 1985·3. I have heard Sri P. K. Jain, learned counsel appearing for the department and Sri Bharatji Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the assessee. Learned standing counsel has urged that the pipe and pipe fittings are not covered under the entry "iron and steel" and was not classified commodity unde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. vs Assistant Collector Of Central ...
Judges: A Banerji, O Prakash
20 November, 1985·2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Ravi, S. Dhavan, Senior Standing Counsel for the Union of India, on behalf of respondents. Since the petition raises a pure question of law and does not involve any disputed question of fact we proceed to decide this writ petition at...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyam Lal Rawat vs Ram Lal And Ors.
Judges: P Dayal
18 November, 1985·(2) Any schedule or annexure to the petition shall also be signed by the petitioner and verified in the same manner as the petition." The word "shall" used in the aforesaid two Ss. 83 and 87 emphasises on the fact that the provisions of these sections have to be strictly followed. 9. It was held in ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhanu Pratap Singh And Ors. vs Smt. Panna Devi And Ors.
Judges: N Ojha, R Shukla
16 November, 1985·2. A preliminary objection has been raised by counsel for the respondents that this appeal is not maintainable as the appellants have no locus standi to challenge the order appealed against dt. 16th July, 1983. Having heard counsel for the parties we are of opinion that there is substance in the pre...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.