Nayak Rahulkumar Kirtansinh vs Gujarat Technological ...
Judges:
04 October, 2012·NAYAK RAHULKUMAR KIRTANSINH - Petitioner(s) Versus GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY - THROUGH REGISTRAR -Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance :MR MEHUL S SHAH for Petitioner(s) : 1,MR SURESH M SHAH for Petitioner(s) : 1, NOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) :...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kribhco vs Union
Judges:
04 October, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Ramnandan Singh, learned advocate for the respondent railway authority.2. In connection with the grievance made by learned advocate for the petitioner on previous occasion, learned advocate for the respondent railway authority has placed...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manojkumar Das & 5 vs Vithal Senu Pan Patil &
Judges:
04 October, 2012·1. In view of the contentions raised referring to the various orders, including the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court at Annexure-A and also considering the fact that alternative arrangement has been made as referred to in Annexure-H, the matter requires consideration, when differ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shrimati Anjanaben Bhupendra- ... vs State Of Gujarat & 3
Judges:
04 October, 2012·At the request of Mr.J.K.Shah, learned AGP, S.O. to 1st November, 2012.In the meantime, fresh Rule to respondent No.3 in Special Civil Application No.666 of 2002 returnable on 1st November, 2012.It will be open for the petitioner/s to serve by speed post.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) (ashish)...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kasavali Judh Samudayak Kheti ... vs State Of Gujarat & 3
Judges:
04 October, 2012·Learned AGP shall place on record present status of the land in question bearing in mind the observations made by this Court in order dated 25.1.2001.To be placed after three weeks.(Akil Kureshi,J.) (raghu)...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kuldeep vs Hiral
Judges:
04 October, 2012·Despite earlier conditional order passed by this Court dated 04/10/2012, office objections are not removed. Hence, considering the earlier conditional order, the present revision application is dismissed for non-prosecution.[M.R.SHAH,J] *dipti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gulam vs State
Judges: M R Shah
04 October, 2012·Office objections to be removed on or before 18/10/2012, failing which, Registry is directed to notify the matters for appropriate order of dismissing the same for non-prosecution on 22/10/2012.[M.R.SHAH,J.] *dipti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat Audhyogik Kamdar ... vs M/S Alindhra Tex Pro Engineers & 3
Judges:
04 October, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Admit.Civil Application No.10166 of 2012 is dismissed as not pressed at this stage.(V.M.SAHAI,J) (G.B.SHAH,J) ***vcdarji...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vipulbhai vs Decd
Judges:
04 October, 2012·The endorsement on the Board indicates that notice issued to respondent No.2 has remained unserved as the said respondent is stated to have expired. In this connection, the petitioners have filed an affidavit-cum-declaration dated 4-10-2012 wherein it is stated that the legal heirs of respondent No....
High Court Of Gujarat
Balkrishan Gopiram Goenka vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges:
04 October, 2012·Notice to the respondents returnable on 29th October, 2012. Mr. H.L. Jani, learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of respondent no.1 - State.Respondent No.2 is permitted to be served through direct service. Till then, Ad-interim relief is granted in terms of Para 8(B) of the application.(RAJ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.