Shree vs Special
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Heard Mr.Vimal A.Purohit, learned advocate for the petitioner. It is submitted by him that the impugned order of the Addl. Secretary (Appeals), dated 9-1-2012 (10-1-2012) whereby the application for grant of interim relief has been rejected is an order on the merits of the case. It is submitted that...
High Court Of Gujarat
Spaco vs Bharatkumar
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Rule.By way of ad-interim relief, the impugned award is stayed only qua the direction regarding continuity of service on condition that the order of reinstatement shall be implemented within a period of 30 days from today. In case of failure to reinstate the respondent-workman by the stipulated peri...
High Court Of Gujarat
Additional vs Ramjibhai
Judges:
11 May, 2012·The present First Appeal has been filed by the appellants-State under sec. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with sec. 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, being aggrieved with the judgment and award passed by the Reference Court (learned Addl. District Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Bharuch...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mittal vs Municipal
Judges:
11 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) The dispute sought to be raised in the petition being purely a contractual dispute after award of contract to the petitioner, the petition is not entertained only on the ground that appropriate alternative remedy has to be pursued by the petitioner.[D.H.WAGH...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mangliben vs Savitaben
Judges:
11 May, 2012·It is reported that as the main Second Appeal itself is disposed of, the present application has become infructuous. Hence, the present application is dismissed as having become infructuous.(M.R.SHAH, J.) siji Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Scarlet vs Unknown
Judges:
11 May, 2012·1. The present petition is filed seeking sanction of Scheme of Amalgamation of P.B.Shah and Marketing Company Private Limited and Scarlet Living Private Limited. Earlier the petitioner had filed Company Application No.216 of 2012 seeking dispensation of meeting of shareholders on the ground that con...
High Court Of Gujarat
Indusind vs State
Judges:
11 May, 2012·1. This application is preferred under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure granting bail to opponent No.2 in Bail Application No.6 of 2012 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Narmada at Rajpipla vide its order dated 21.1.2012 in complaint registered as C.R.No.I-5 of 2012 with Rajpipla pol...
High Court Of Gujarat
Additional vs Administrator
Judges:
11 May, 2012·The present First Appeal has been filed by the appellants-State under sec. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with sec. 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, being aggrieved with the judgment and award passed by the Reference Court (learned Addl. District Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Bharuch...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abhijit vs State
Judges:
11 May, 2012·1. In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Code' for short) and under Provisions of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and the Provisions of Drugs and ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Parth vs Sraddha
Judges:
11 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) As prayed for by the learned advocate for the petitioner, he is at liberty to add some additional parties, as proposed. Such addition be made within one week after reopening. Let a copy of the writ-application be served upon all the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.