Karshanbhai vs State
Judges:
11 May, 2012·1 Rule.Service is waived. Upon joint request made by the learned advocates for the parties, this matter is taken up for final disposal.2 This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [for short, 'the Code'] is filed by the applicant to quash the FIR being C.R. No.I-37 of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Botad vs Pratapray
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Rule.Notice as to interim relief returnable on 28.06.2012.By way of ad-interim relief, the impugned award is stayed qua the direction regarding continuity of service and grant of 70% back- wages. The order of reinstatement shall be implemented within a period of thirty days from today. In case of fa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kaniyabhai vs State
Judges:
11 May, 2012·By way of present application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the applicants have prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R.No. I - 78 of 2012 registered with Dahod Rural Police Station, Dist: Dahod for the offence under Sections 436, 504 and 114 of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bombay vs Hemkalaben
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Rule returnable on 7th November, 2012.In the meantime the petitioner shall deposit the entire amount as directed by the authority/Court below before this Court within a period of six weeks from today. The Registry shall invest the entire amount in FDR with a nationalised bank initially for a period ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vajsur vs Dahyabhai
Judges:
11 May, 2012·1. The present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellants-original plaintiffs to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vadhvan dated 11/02/2003 in Regular Civil Suit No. 54/19...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhaked vs State
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Heard Mr. Nanavati, learned advocate for the petitioner.Mr.Nanavati, learned advocate for the petitioner, has submitted that present petition is exactly identical to the writ petition being Special Civil Application No.5919 of 2012 and the issues as well as subject involved in both matters are simil...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Ramabhilash
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Heard.Considering the averments made in the application, the same is allowed in terms of Para 3 - (B) & (C).In the main matter, issue fresh Notice, as prayed for, making it returnable on 23.07.2012.The application stand disposed of accordingly.[K.S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Sheeladevi
Judges:
11 May, 2012·In view of the averments made in the applications, the same are granted in terms of para 5(B) and (B ). The applications stand disposed of accordingly.Issue Fresh Notice to respondent Nos. 1 and 3, in main matters, by way of substitute service, making it returnable on 20th June, 2012.(K.S.JHAVERI,J....
High Court Of Gujarat
Krishna vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
11 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Learned counsel, Mr. Parikh sought permission to withdraw the petition on instructions of the petitioner.Permission being granted, petition is disposed as withdrawn.[D.H.WAGHELA, J.] [MOHINDER PAL, J.] JYOTI Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anilsinh vs State
Judges:
11 May, 2012·This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with First Information Report registered as I-C.R. No.150/2012 with Odhav Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 294(B) of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 25(1)(b)(...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.