Mill vs District
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicant has made endorsement that office objections are removed. Office to verify whether office objection are removed or not. If the office objections are not removed, the matter to be listed for further order on 11.06.2012.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) niru* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paschim vs Zala
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Rule returnable on 22.6.2012.(Rajesh H. Shukla, J.) (hn) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sahyog vs State
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Heard learned counsels for the parties.It is submitted that the averment of payment of dues to the respondent-Bank pursuant to the OTS remains undisputed.In view of the above, interim relief in terms of paragraph 31(B) till further orders.S.O.To 18.7.2012.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Kirit(Minor)
Judges:
11 May, 2012·In spite of earlier order dated 19.04.2012, no action has been taken by the learned advocate for the appellant. Therefore, the present appeal stands dismissed for default. No order as to costs.[K.S.JHAVERI,J.] pawan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner Of Income Tax-I vs Learned Counsel Is Not Able To ...
Judges:
11 May, 2012·(PER : HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI) Challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad [ Tribunal for short] dated 11th May 2012, this Tax Appeal is preferred raising following substantial questions of law for our consideration :-{A} Whether the tribunal was right in law in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Madhusudan vs O.L
Judges:
11 May, 2012·1) The present Judge's Summons is taken out with the following prayers :"A) That Your Lordships be pleased to direct the respondent to pay the amount of gratuity and retrenchment compensation as per the Settlement between Mills Company and Textile Labour Association;B) Direct the respondent to pay t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Santokben vs Hemchandrachayra
Judges:
11 May, 2012·1. Heard learned advocate Ms. Vyoma Jhaveri for learned advocate Mr.Dipen Desai for the petitioners. She has submitted that petitioners will fill up requisite forms and submit necessary applications and will also pay all requisite fees as per rules of the respondent University and/or NCTE, latest by...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manishkumar vs Amitaben
Judges:
11 May, 2012·It is reported by the learned advocates for the respective parties under the instruction from their respective clients that parties have settled the dispute amicably and appellant husband has agreed to pay Rs.5,51,000/- to the respondent wife within a period of three months towards permanent alimony...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatkumar vs Kantibhai
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Learned advocate Ms. Niyati Shah appearing for Mr. D.K Puj, learned advocate for the petitioners urges this Court, while challenging the order impugned passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Surat in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 100 of 2012 that counter application for injunction is pending befor...
High Court Of Gujarat
Samusunisha vs Vishnukumar
Judges:
11 May, 2012·This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is at the instance of original defendants and is directed against order dated 3rd September, 2007 passed by Second Additional Senior Civil Judge, Surat in delay condonation application no. 24/2005 and thereby the Trial Court condoned the delay of 5...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.