Mahmad vs State
Judges:
17 May, 2012·[1] Present application is filed by the wife of the convict seeking 90 days parole for her own treatment.[2] An application was filed before the I.G. (Jails), which was rejected by order dated 06.03.2012. Reasons mentioned therein are that earlier the convict was released for treatment of his wife f...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prafulbhai vs State
Judges:
17 May, 2012·Present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking parole leave for a period of 60 days on the various reasons which are set out in the application. The convict wants to take share in the agricultural land and also wanted to get his well renovated as well as to take three phase connect...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harshadkumar vs The
Judges:
17 May, 2012·Present application is filed through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 21 days to provide educational facilities to his daughter who is studying in 12th standard.2. Rule.Mr.Patel, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule. Learned APP makes available for perusal...
High Court Of Gujarat
Faridbhai vs State
Judges:
17 May, 2012·Present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 30 days to attend the marriages of nephew and niece.2. Rule.Mr.Patel, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule. Learned APP makes available for perusal the jail remarks. From ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bahadurbhai vs State
Judges:
17 May, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The present application is disposed of as withdrawn.(Ravi R. Tripathi, J.) #MH Dave Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manjitsing vs State
Judges:
17 May, 2012·1. The present application is filed by applicant convict through his wife seeking temporary bail for a period of 30 days so as to arrange for the admission of his daughter in a school after making necessary financial arrangement.2. RULE.Learned APP Mr. Patel waives service of rule on behalf of respo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jivanbhai vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
17 May, 2012·1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioners herein for the following main reliefs:"12(B) Your Lordships be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus quashing and set...
High Court Of Gujarat
Darshan vs State
Judges:
17 May, 2012·1. Rule.Mr.N.J.Shah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent.2. With the consent of the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, both these applications are taken up for f...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nasratkhan vs State
Judges:
17 May, 2012·[1] Present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a a period of 15 days on the ground of Aakika and Mannat ceremony of daughter of his brother in law (wife's brother).[2] Rule.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.H.K.Patel waives service of process of Rule.[3...
High Court Of Gujarat
Deva vs State
Judges:
17 May, 2012·1. The present application is filed by the wife of the convict - Vejiben Devabhai Hun seeking temporary bail for a period of 45 days so as to undertake partition of the agricultural land with his uncle and thereafter to sale the same so as to repay the debts. In support of the application, copy of v...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.