Punam vs State
Judges:
03 May, 2012·This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with First Information Report registered as I-C.R. No.29/2011 with DCB Police Station, Vadodara for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 506, 507 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.Learned Counsel appear...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Shashikalaben
Judges:
03 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) The present application is for leave to prefer appeal against the judgment and order passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.26 of 2009, whereby, certain accused have been acquitted for the offence under Sections 306, 498-A, 114 of IPC read...
High Court Of Gujarat
Malabhai vs District
Judges:
03 May, 2012·1. By filing present petition the petitioner, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the order of detention dated 17.04.2009 passed, against the petitioner, by the respondent No.1 - the District Magistrate, Gandhinagar, in exercise of power u...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kandhal vs State
Judges:
03 May, 2012·Heard the learned counsels for the parties.It is submitted that the impugned complaint is filed after six months of the alleged incident and the version in the complaint does not inspire any confidence and the allegations are vague.In view of the above, Ad-interim relief in terms of paragraph 19(B)....
High Court Of Gujarat
Posco vs Unknown
Judges:
02 May, 2012·1. Upon the application of the abovenamed company by summons dated 20th April 2012, filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, upon hearing Smt. Swati Soparkar, learned counsel for the applicant-company and upon reading of the affidavit dated 19th April 2012, filed in support of the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hirabhai vs State
Judges:
02 May, 2012·When the petitions are taken out for hearing, learned advocate for the petitioners is not present. It is noticed that learned advocate for the petitioners consistently has not been attending the hearing of the petitions which are listed from time to time. Therefore in view of consistent absence of l...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nehal vs State
Judges:
02 May, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw this petition at this stage.Permission granted as prayed for. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shravankumar vs State
Judges:
02 May, 2012·By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with Prohi.CR No.5039 of 2012 registered with Sayla Police Station, for the offence punishable under Sections 66(B), 65(A)(E) and 116(...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.