Bhagubhai vs Union
Judges:
03 May, 2012·Notice returnable on 8.5.2012.Learned advocate Mr.Ravi Karnavat appears for all the three respondents. He waives service of notice for all the three respondents.(Ms.Sonia Gokani, J.) sudhir Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
I.B vs Employee'S
Judges:
03 May, 2012·Rule.Expedited.Heard and also considered the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Mangalore Vs. Central Aercanut and Coca Marketing and Processing Co-op. Limited, Mangalore- 2006 (0) GLHEL-SC 36587.The impugned order is stayed on condition that the petition...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mayankkumar vs State
Judges:
03 May, 2012·1. Heard learned advocate Mr.G.M.Joshi appearing for the petitioners and learned AGP Mr.Janak Raval appearing for respondent state.2. Learned AGP Mr.Raval relied on the judgment dated 20/07/2010 in group of Letters Patent Appeal being Letters Patent Appeal No.85 of 2010 and connected matters.3. Lear...
High Court Of Gujarat
Indravadan vs State
Judges:
03 May, 2012·This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred with the following prayers:-(a) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the State Government and Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation to cons...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether vs Ramaben
Judges:
03 May, 2012·1.0. Present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellant-original defendant to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 4.12.2007 passed by the learned Appellate Court -learned 2nd Additional District Judge, Sabarkantha-Himatnag...
High Court Of Gujarat
Unnadbhai vs State
Judges:
03 May, 2012·Heard Mr.Matafer Pande, learned counsel for the applicant. He states that the matter is settled between the parties. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to approach the lower Court to expedite the trial.In view of statement made by Mr.Pande, learned couns...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abidabanu vs State
Judges:
03 May, 2012·Heard learned counsel for the applicants.It is submitted that petitioner Nos. 1 to 4 are residing at Mumbai and petitioner Nos. 5 and 6 are married before years and staying separately and the proceeding impugned is an abuse of process of law.Issue notice returnable on 14.6.2012.Ad-interim relief in ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dev vs Jaykrishna
Judges:
03 May, 2012·Mr.P.A. Mehd, learned advocate for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Permission is granted. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.The petitioner shall give a public notice to the effect that this petition is withdrawn in Western Times, Ahmedabad Editi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Deputy vs Unknown
Judges:
03 May, 2012·The present Civil Applications have been filed by the Applicant - State under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the aforesaid First Appeals on the grounds stated in the Applications inter alia the procedural delay in getting necessary approval after completing the fo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.